At 14:56 28-2-2001 +0100, you wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > should look like. Make the size_t unsigned int instead in loop
> > and rd.
> My mistake, I was looking at the wrong function. There's no
> mixup in the xfs tree.
I would provide a patch for rd too, but the tree still has the kgcc
stupidity that prevents me from compiling. Yes I could fix it easily,
but it annoys me heavily that such a change was made blindly
assuming that we all need kgcc. So I'm holding further contributions
for now until this is fixed -- yes I'm silly, but so is this
I agree, I build the tree more often on non redhat 7 boxes.
Btw, gcc 2.95.2 seems to work under debian 2.2_r2.
Not really tested, but it compiles and mounting worked.
Has anybody seen my lightbulb?
I _really_ need some light here.