xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:08:22 +0200
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Staubach <staubach@xxxxxxxxxx>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090926131043.GA25204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:10:43 -0400")
References: <20090518114305.GA6303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87vdj742dt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090926131043.GA25204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:47:42PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I added some fresh test results to
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645.  In short, under
>> 2.6.30-rc8 the test program reports full failure on XFS and RAMFS,
>> full success on EXT3, VFAT and ReiserFS, and mixed results on TMPFS:
>
> There's a patch queued up for inclusion in 2.6.32 to work around this
> issue in XFS.  The lack of a proper callout from the VFS still makes
> this a much less than ideal solution.

Great, anyway!  Somehow I managed to gloss over this mail until now,
but happened to test 2.6.32-rc4 and found the issue fixed.  At least
for XFS, as my latest addition to the bug report details it.  Thank
you very much for taking care of this issue!
-- 
Regards,
Feri.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up, Ferenc Wagner <=