|Subject:||Re: Things todo before we announce|
|From:||"Christopher C. Petro" <petro@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:08 -0800|
|References:||<200003291619.KAA22984@fsgi344.americas.sgi.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <10003300954.ZM7142@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <14562.42090.314696.82332B@gibble.americas.sgi.com> <10003301105.ZM7400@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <14562.44287.39273.95483R@gibble.americas.sgi.com>|
At Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:05:54 -0500, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The point I was getting at: We shouldn't pollute the system with stuff people can't distinctly remove; not util xfs it more accecpted.
On the contrary, as soon as XFS is stable enough to use, I'm going to put it on a development machine. We have this project where we are working with about 10 million 2k files, some directories having over 65k entries.
We have only come here seeking knowledge
Things they would not teach us of in college.--The Police
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available!, Xavier Bertou|
|Next by Date:||Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available!, cattelan|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Things todo before we announce, Andi Kleen|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Things todo before we announce, cattelan|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|