Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Fix\s+locking\s+bug\s+in\s+lltx\s+path\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Fix\s+locking\s+bug\s+in\s+lltx\s+path\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: xxxx (Serge E. Hallyn); Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:11:00 +0200; then t; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00427.html (8,535 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: reear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:18:59 -0700; Subject; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00429.html (8,067 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: nandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:26:49 +0200; again.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00430.html (8,630 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:39:53 -0400; e fine.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00432.html (9,310 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: n Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:02:44 -0700; pinlock; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00433.html (8,968 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 13 Sep 2004 21:43:24 -0400; route.h; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00460.html (10,537 bytes)
7. [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:11:00 +0200; Thanks to Arjan's spinlock debug kernel for finding it. This fixes a silly missing spin lock in the relock path. For some reason it seems to still work when you don't have spinlock debugging enabled.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01883.html (8,535 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:18:59 -0700; Good catch, but I'll need to fix this up to use the new macros defined in linux/netdevice.h Thanks again.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01885.html (8,111 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:26:49 +0200; Ok, do you want me to send a new patch with that? I don't think the new macros are in -bk* snapshots yet, and getting it otherwise is difficult for me. It's probably fastest if you just apply it by h; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01886.html (8,726 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:39:53 -0400; This fixes a silly missing spin lock in the relock path. For some reason it seems to still work when you don't have spinlock debugging enabled. Please apply. -Andi -- Fix missing spin lock in lltx pa; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01888.html (9,274 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:02:44 -0700; I'll take care of it. It's in 2.6.9-rc2; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01889.html (9,087 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 13 Sep 2004 21:43:24 -0400; Finaly got around to testing today and got bitten by this (was planning to send patch);-> In any case, some good news: one of the NICs tested was e1000 with and without LLTX pure forwarding (eth0->et; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01916.html (10,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]