Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/10\]\s+merge\s+xfs_unmount\s+into\s+xfs_fs_put_super\s+\/\s+xfs_fs_fill

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/10\]\s+merge\s+xfs_unmount\s+into\s+xfs_fs_put_super\s+\/\s+xfs_fs_fill_super\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 00:00:48 +0200; xfs_unmount is small and already pretty Linux specific, so merge it into the callers. The real unmount path is simplified a little by doing a WARN_ON on the xfs_unmount_flush retval directly instead; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00015.html (14,816 bytes)
2. s_remount (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 08:31:58 +0200; Respin ontop of the kmem_free signature change: Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c == -- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-05-09 08:18:05.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00100.html (15,380 bytes)
3. callbacks (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:43:50 +1000; This hunk does not apply - xfs_mntupdate() is defined in this file in the current tree. <sigh> Oh, this is on top a bunch of other patches you sent a while back that no-one has picked up. I'll go get; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00107.html (9,211 bytes)
4. k devices (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:21:38 +1000; but it would then match the pre-unmount event hunk above... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00109.html (11,905 bytes)
5. ill_super (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 01:43:27 -0400; We don't have #ifdefs around the other dmapi namespace bits. In fact I'd prefer to kill the one above aswell. It's on my todo list because I wan't to prove that using the normal event enabled macros; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00110.html (8,920 bytes)
6. w xfs_args_allocate to fail (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 00:00:48 +0200; .orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00499.html (14,816 bytes)
7. rge xfs_mntupdate into xfs_fs_remount (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 08:31:58 +0200; 08:16:46.000000000 +0200 ++; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00584.html (15,380 bytes)
8. ATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:43:50 +1000; I Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00591.html (9,211 bytes)
9. ning and closing of the block devices (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:21:38 +1000; Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinn; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00593.html (11,905 bytes)
10. xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 01:43:27 -0400; I Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00594.html (8,920 bytes)
11. [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 00:00:48 +0200; xfs_unmount is small and already pretty Linux specific, so merge it into the callers. The real unmount path is simplified a little by doing a WARN_ON on the xfs_unmount_flush retval directly instead; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00983.html (14,816 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 08:31:58 +0200; Respin ontop of the kmem_free signature change: Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c == -- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-05-09 08:18:05.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01068.html (15,438 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:43:50 +1000; This hunk does not apply - xfs_mntupdate() is defined in this file in the current tree. <sigh> Oh, this is on top a bunch of other patches you sent a while back that no-one has picked up. I'll go get; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01075.html (9,300 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:21:38 +1000; but it would then match the pre-unmount event hunk above... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01077.html (11,963 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH 1/10] merge xfs_unmount into xfs_fs_put_super / xfs_fs_fill_super (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 01:43:27 -0400; We don't have #ifdefs around the other dmapi namespace bits. In fact I'd prefer to kill the one above aswell. It's on my todo list because I wan't to prove that using the normal event enabled macros; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01078.html (9,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]