Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+kill\s+attr

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+kill\s+attr_capable\s+callbacks\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. ilesystem (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:47:21 +1000; Seeing you are working on xattr stuff right now, can you pick this up? (and the followup patch as well?) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00106.html (15,246 bytes)
2. k devices (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:22:37 +1000; Yep. --Tim; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00112.html (16,104 bytes)
3. callbacks (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:27:33 +0200; Btw, here's the generic acl conversion rebased ontop of these two patches. Still haven't managed to sort out the other issues with it. Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_acl.c == -- /dev/null; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00113.html (68,312 bytes)
4. complete (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:05:45 +1000; Hi Christoph, Looks reasonable to me - comparing xattr_permission() with attr_user_capable() and attr_trusted_capable(). Also the xattr_permission() makes more sense with its MAY_WRITE testing otherw; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00153.html (15,290 bytes)
5. ocking dependency with xfs filesystem (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:47:21 +1000; se positive - can never cau; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00590.html (15,246 bytes)
6. ning and closing of the block devices (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:22:37 +1000; ch below: Index: linux-2.6-; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00596.html (16,104 bytes)
7. ATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:27:33 +0200; ndex: linux-2.6-; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00597.html (68,312 bytes)
8. reclaim wait for log I/O to complete (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:05:45 +1000; never see a pinned inode t; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00637.html (15,290 bytes)
9. lushsema (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:22:13 +0200; tion.; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00575.html (12,092 bytes)
10. emove l_flushsema (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:22:13 +0200; n being on this wait queue; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01171.html (12,092 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:47:21 +1000; Tim, Seeing you are working on xattr stuff right now, can you pick this up? (and the followup patch as well?) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01074.html (15,362 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:22:37 +1000; Yep. --Tim; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01080.html (16,230 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:27:33 +0200; Btw, here's the generic acl conversion rebased ontop of these two patches. Still haven't managed to sort out the other issues with it. Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_acl.c == -- /dev/null; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01081.html (68,438 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:05:45 +1000; Hi Christoph, Looks reasonable to me - comparing xattr_permission() with attr_user_capable() and attr_trusted_capable(). Also the xattr_permission() makes more sense with its MAY_WRITE testing otherw; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01121.html (15,406 bytes)
15. [PATCH 1/2] kill attr_capable callbacks (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:22:13 +0200; No need for addition permission checks in the xattr handler, fs/xattr.c:xattr_permission() already does them, and in fact slightly more strict then what was in the attr_capable handlers. Signed-off-b; /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01767.html (12,092 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]