Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bug\s+about\s+XFS\-1\.0\.1\s+on\s+2\.4\.5\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. on! (score: 1)

Author: r@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:40:47 +0800

Reiser, I've found, is much quicker at most things than EXT3, unless you want to some benefits of journaling. As the speed is not the problem (this is fileserver ONL

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00496.html (9,174 bytes)

2. ION! Samba + XFS + ACL support (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 29 Jun 2002 11:45:13 -0400

using XFS modified RedHat 7.3 system and tries to compile SRPMS with Samba 2.2.5 (maybe also 2.2.4) with ACL support and Samba doesn't detect any ACL support: upgra

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00497.html (8,028 bytes)

3. g about XFS-1.0.1 on 2.4.5 (score: 1)

Author: en@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 00:12:14 +0800

know some of you might be busy on kernel summit, we just can's believe XFS has such a serious bug. For some reason, we must stick on 2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1. We have the sup

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00498.html (8,555 bytes)

4. g about XFS-1.0.1 on 2.4.5 (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:50:50 -0700

ng that you must stick with old, (apparently) buggy code. We simply don't have the bandwidth to support xfs & kernel code from 1 year ago. Your best bet would be to

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00499.html (9,709 bytes)

5. s() and non-executables (score: 1)

Author: Vanek <libor@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:40:47 +0800

ed. I suspect you may have found a hole in the endian conversion code in XFS. Doing the copy into the filesystem over NFS is probab

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg01000.html (9,174 bytes)

6. FS corruption! (score: 1)

Author: c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 29 Jun 2002 11:45:13 -0400

r at most things than EXT3, unless you want to some benefits of journaling. -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics,

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg01001.html (8,028 bytes)

7. ! (score: 1)

Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 00:12:14 +0800

r at most things than EXT3, unless you want to some benefits of journaling. As the speed is not the problem (this is fileserver ONL

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg01002.html (8,555 bytes)

8. amba + XFS + ACL support (score: 1)

Author: c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:50:50 -0700

em and tries to compile SRPMS with Samba 2.2.5 (maybe also 2.2.4) with ACL support and Samba doesn't detect any ACL support: upgra

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg01003.html (9,709 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]