Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+file\s+corruption\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+file\s+corruption\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. rnel oops with XFS and NFS (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:51:49 +0800 (CST); w hours with just the mail partition being shared; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00423.html (7,262 bytes)
2. with XFS and NFS (score: 1): Author: d@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:58:04 +0200; m us, we are a bit thin on the ground at the moment, and there are going to be less of us around for a couple of weeks. All I can really recommend is getting the fil; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00426.html (7,959 bytes)
3. x mkfs stripe calculation problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:42:28 +0800 (CST); pe code. Using just a data stripe unit would cause a divide by zero error. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid:; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00427.html (8,188 bytes)
4. problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:04:16 +0200; file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid:; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00428.html (9,386 bytes)
5. ing 2.4-xfs from cvs tree (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:28:26 +0800 (CST); minutes after Eric Sandeen's checkin upgrading the tree to 2.4.19-rc1. I'm guessing that maybe you got hit by checking things out at almost the same time he was ch; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00449.html (9,793 bytes)
6. en file corruption? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:33:56 +0200; clean install using the SGI installer. I have searched the archive for a solution to the umask not being set properly on NFS mounted volumes. I am mounting the Linux; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00452.html (8,427 bytes)
7. lem for xfs (score: 1): Author: d@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:36:45 -0400 (EDT); to new install xfs 1.0.2 from iso image. But fail everytime in transfering install image to disk.... It always say that it might be out of disk space. But I am sure the hardware; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00456.html (8,421 bytes)
8. ops with XFS and NFS (score: 1): Author: nd <knutjbj@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:51:49 +0800 (CST); afraid I'm goin; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00927.html (7,262 bytes)
9. oops with XFS and NFS (score: 1): Author: ve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:58:04 +0200; afraid I'm going; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00930.html (7,959 bytes)
10. file corruption? (score: 1): Author: os <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:42:28 +0800 (CST); is corrupted after power failure. But is it possible for a file that is opened for read-only access becomes corrupted after accide; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00931.html (8,188 bytes)
11. el oops with XFS and NFS (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:04:16 +0200; only access becomes corrupted after accide; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00932.html (9,386 bytes)
12. ument list too long (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:28:26 +0800 (CST); lease is out (AFAIK no patched kernel exists yet, but maybe one of the distributors have a fixed kernel by now). cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00953.html (9,793 bytes)
13. 4-xfs from cvs tree (score: 1): Author: l <apel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:33:56 +0200; inx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: xfs-cmds:slinx:122265a cmd/acl/VERSION - 1.29 cmd/acl/doc/CHANGES - 1.33 cmd/acl/debian/changelog - 1.24 cmd/; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00956.html (8,427 bytes)
14. S NFS and umask (score: 1): Author: ve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:36:45 -0400 (EDT); your suggestion. My concern is that whether my current XFS 1.0.1 release may lose data for files opened as read-only. Someone has seen once o; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00960.html (8,421 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]