Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Using\s+Amanda\s+with\s+Linux\/XFS\:\s+\"failed\s+to\s+get\s+\(valid\)\s+bulkstat\s+information\"\s*$/: 11 ]
Total 11 documents matching your query.
- 1. Indy Drive (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:24:32 +0100
- y wrote: But, after checking out the archives, it seems that I'm falling victim to the page size restriction. Now, here are my questions: The XFS CVS has support fo
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00432.html (9,663 bytes)
- 2. /Linux and Indy Drive (score: 1)
- Author: " <zach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:24:32 +0100
- el HW. Better update to something more recent like the 1.1 release. It fixes a lot of issues including the file corruption during
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00936.html (9,663 bytes)
- 3. s characters in filenames (score: 1)
- Author: st@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:26:14 +0100
- here's a patch for Amanda 2.4.2p2 to ignore xfsdump's occasionally output on busy filesystems "WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode ..." and "WARNING: failed to get valid bulkstat i
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00727.html (8,966 bytes)
- 4. - merge up to 2.5.3-pre6 (score: 1)
- Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:38:55 -0500
- Thanks. Before I put this in, is there any particular reason you're adding DMP_WARNING? Why not just add these entries as DMP_NORMAL? John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, jrj@xxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00858.html (8,246 bytes)
- 5. on xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1)
- Author: <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:24:32 +0100
- First reason (beauty): I decided to put the warnings into a different group than the normal output, just to be ready for further additions of warnings of other dump programs and to have the ability
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00861.html (10,148 bytes)
- 6. xfs vs previous XFS versions and certain non-us characters in filenames (score: 1)
- Author: qvist <lindqvist@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:26:14 +0100
- here's a patch for Amanda 2.4.2p2 to ignore xfsdump's occasionally output on busy filesystems "WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode ..." and "WARNING: failed to get valid bulkstat i
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01656.html (8,966 bytes)
- 7. remove a function xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:38:55 -0500
- Thanks. Before I put this in, is there any particular reason you're adding DMP_WARNING? Why not just add these entries as DMP_NORMAL? John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, jrj@xxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01787.html (8,246 bytes)
- 8. XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:24:32 +0100
- First reason (beauty): I decided to put the warnings into a different group than the normal output, just to be ready for further additions of warnings of other dump programs and to have the ability
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01790.html (10,148 bytes)
- 9. Using Amanda with Linux/XFS: "failed to get (valid) bulkstat information" (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:26:14 +0100
- Hi, here's a patch for Amanda 2.4.2p2 to ignore xfsdump's occasionally output on busy filesystems "WARNING: failed to get bulkstat information for inode ..." and "WARNING: failed to get valid bulksta
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02585.html (8,966 bytes)
- 10. Re: Using Amanda with Linux/XFS: "failed to get (valid) bulkstat information" (score: 1)
- Author: "John R. Jackson" <jrj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:38:55 -0500
- Thanks. Before I put this in, is there any particular reason you're adding DMP_WARNING? Why not just add these entries as DMP_NORMAL? John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, jrj@xxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02716.html (8,270 bytes)
- 11. Re: Using Amanda with Linux/XFS: "failed to get (valid) bulkstat information" (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:24:32 +0100
- First reason (beauty): I decided to put the warnings into a different group than the normal output, just to be ready for further additions of warnings of other dump programs and to have the ability
- /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02719.html (10,177 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu