Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+RAID\s+10\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 11 Oct 2001 20:24:19 -0700

I have setup a little (280G) xfs on RAID 10 (RAID 1 on RAID 0). This has 8 SCSI drives (4 per card). Everything seems to work fine, expect the RAID resync craaaawwwllllsss. It goes at the minimum of

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00360.html (7,712 bytes)

2. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Scott Murray <scottm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:41:31 -0400 (EDT)

[snip] echo N > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min where N is how many KB per second you want the raid driver to attempt to resync at. There is a speed_limit_max, which you'd think would be the contr

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00363.html (8,470 bytes)

3. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:34:21 +0200

At 20:24 11-10-2001 -0700, Thomas Duffy wrote: I have setup a little (280G) xfs on RAID 10 (RAID 1 on RAID 0). This has 8 SCSI drives (4 per card). Hardware, software or something in the middle? Ever

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00366.html (9,207 bytes)

4. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:00:44 +0200

from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F70157306; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:00:45 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00367.html (9,760 bytes)

5. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:16:22 +0200

from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2E757306; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:16:23 +0200 (CEST) Organization: Sauter AG, Basel References: <1002857

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00371.html (10,306 bytes)

6. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 12 Oct 2001 12:34:55 -0700

all software 2.4.11 now...will move up to 2.4.13-pre1 shortly...compiled with redhat's 2.96-85 (i think I have the minor right here)...I know this is not the "supported" compiler, but it seems to wor

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00385.html (9,294 bytes)

7. XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 11 Oct 2001 20:24:19 -0700

t

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01440.html (7,712 bytes)

8. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Scott Murray <scottm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:41:31 -0400 (EDT)

o

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01443.html (8,470 bytes)

9. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:34:21 +0200

e

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01446.html (9,207 bytes)

10. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:00:44 +0200

r

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01447.html (9,760 bytes)

11. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:16:22 +0200

6

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01451.html (10,306 bytes)

12. Re: XFS on RAID 10 (score: 1)

Author: Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 12 Oct 2001 12:34:55 -0700

e

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01465.html (9,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]