Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*about\s+the\s+mmap\s+problem\s*$/: 6 ]
Total 6 documents matching your query.
- 1. Re: about the mmap problem (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 09 Jul 2002 16:33:23 -0500
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00045.html (7,381 bytes)
- 2. ode (score: 1)
- Author: <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Jul 2002 16:33:23 -0500
- ve been looking at xfs_bmapi() anyway, and it has fairly high stack usage, trim
- /archives/xfs/2002-07/msg00476.html (7,381 bytes)
- 3. - tweak inode handling (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:33:33 +0300
- ayaratne ___________
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00405.html (6,691 bytes)
- 4. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2002 18:15:49 -0500
- 53
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00406.html (7,303 bytes)
- 5. dissapearing files! (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:33:33 +0300
- a little like the root inode is not getting flushed during unmount. If your root directoy size is less than 4K then it is all within the inode. Is this a recent kernel? Steve -- Steve L
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00909.html (6,691 bytes)
- 6. Case of the dissapearing files! (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2002 18:15:49 -0500
- el version is 2.4.18-xfs-1.1 If I create a diretory in the "/" it remains after a reboot and gets to the inode. I verified the inode info with xfs_db. == -- Ravi Wijayaratne ___________
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00910.html (7,303 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu