Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*data\s+corruption\s+on\s+nfs\+xfs\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:30:31 +0900
I have reproduced similar problem on xfs1.3.1 (based on 2.4.21), my environment is as follows. nfs server : OS : RedHat9 + xfs1.3.1 (based on 2.4.21) CPU : Xeon(2.4GHz) x 2 MEM : 1GB NIC : Intel PR
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00100.html (13,798 bytes)

2. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:48:03 +1000
Hi there, Thank you, and an excellent explanation too. I think you may well have figured it out. I'm sure Russell will have more to add tomorrow when he's awake. I've ported your patch forward to cur
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00103.html (15,063 bytes)

3. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: han Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:55:13 +0900
Hi Nathan, Thank you for commenting. I am glad to contribute to development of XFS. Regards, Tsuda
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00106.html (9,404 bytes)

4. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: r Krienke <krienke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:27:05 -0600
I ported the patch last night to the 2.4.26 kernel when I saw Tsuda's post. This patch seems to have solved my problem. I will continue to test. Thanks, Craig
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00107.html (8,757 bytes)

5. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:26:46 +0900
Thank you. I also think so. I think that following issue may be caused (I don't reproduce following issue). This problem is another with the previous problem and is based on asynchronous updating ino
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00113.html (19,642 bytes)

6. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: r Krienke <krienke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:58:04 -0500
So far, so good. I have not seen any more corruption since I applied the patch. I thank everybody involved, especially Masanori for identifying the problem and providing a working solution. Andy
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00114.html (9,382 bytes)

7. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: tsuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:38:53 -0500
This looks really promising. I'm currently reading through the code again to see what kind of implications this might have. I'm worried that you're patch might increase file fragmentation, but that i
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00116.html (16,281 bytes)

8. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:37:03 +0900
We have no such corruption with the patch for more than four days. We all thank very much, Tsuda-san and everyone involved. About the following problem, it was another problem, and has no relation wi
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00118.html (10,263 bytes)

9. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
I have similar problems on some XFS exported volumes. I tried to follow this thread backwards, but failed to find the posted patch. Is this patch part of a formal set or where can this be acquired? T
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00121.html (10,669 bytes)

10. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:32:48 +0900
Not formal yet, maybe. I'm using Tsuda's patch "xfs1.3.1-delalloc.patch", which is attached to: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2004-06/msg00124.html And the patches for current CVS is provided
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00129.html (11,923 bytes)

11. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:30:31 +0900
I have reproduced similar problem on xfs1.3.1 (based on 2.4.21), my environment is as follows. nfs server : OS : RedHat9 + xfs1.3.1 (based on 2.4.21) CPU : Xeon(2.4GHz) x 2 MEM : 1GB NIC : Intel PR
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00386.html (13,798 bytes)

12. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:48:03 +1000
Hi there, Thank you, and an excellent explanation too. I think you may well have figured it out. I'm sure Russell will have more to add tomorrow when he's awake. I've ported your patch forward to cur
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00389.html (15,063 bytes)

13. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:55:13 +0900
Hi Nathan, Thank you for commenting. I am glad to contribute to development of XFS. Regards, Tsuda
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00392.html (9,404 bytes)

14. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:27:05 -0600
I ported the patch last night to the 2.4.26 kernel when I saw Tsuda's post. This patch seems to have solved my problem. I will continue to test. Thanks, Craig
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00393.html (8,757 bytes)

15. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:26:46 +0900
Thank you. I also think so. I think that following issue may be caused (I don't reproduce following issue). This problem is another with the previous problem and is based on asynchronous updating ino
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00399.html (19,642 bytes)

16. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:58:04 -0500
So far, so good. I have not seen any more corruption since I applied the patch. I thank everybody involved, especially Masanori for identifying the problem and providing a working solution. Andy
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00400.html (9,382 bytes)

17. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: daniel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:38:53 -0500
This looks really promising. I'm currently reading through the code again to see what kind of implications this might have. I'm worried that you're patch might increase file fragmentation, but that i
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00402.html (16,281 bytes)

18. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: SUDA <tsuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:37:03 +0900
We have no such corruption with the patch for more than four days. We all thank very much, Tsuda-san and everyone involved. About the following problem, it was another problem, and has no relation wi
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00404.html (10,263 bytes)

19. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
I have similar problems on some XFS exported volumes. I tried to follow this thread backwards, but failed to find the posted patch. Is this patch part of a formal set or where can this be acquired? T
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00407.html (10,669 bytes)

20. Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:32:48 +0900
Not formal yet, maybe. I'm using Tsuda's patch "xfs1.3.1-delalloc.patch", which is attached to: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2004-06/msg00124.html And the patches for current CVS is provided
/archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00415.html (11,923 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]

This search system is powered by Namazu