Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kernel\s+oops\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. . (score: 1)
Author: ltic" <warrenji1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:59:29 +0200
n
/archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00327.html (12,195 bytes)

2. report. (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:30:29 -0500
11 root@backup:/backup# ln -s foo bar root@backup:/backup# xfs_quota -x -c 'project -c 0' Checking project 7 (path /backup)..
/archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00332.html (14,195 bytes)

3. Directory Returned mail: see transcript for details (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:59:29 +0200
Regards, Nigel
/archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00704.html (12,195 bytes)

4. inare qui. (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:30:29 -0500
esume). Even if it does anything after the sync, it's okay as long as that's befor
/archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00709.html (14,195 bytes)

5. g about XFS-1.0.1 on 2.4.5 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:01:10 +0200
ry to backport vm fixes to 2.4.5, which kernel have most probably addressed this issue? 2.4.7? There is no evidence about it from kenrel ChangeLog. Sorry to occupy X
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00500.html (10,394 bytes)

6. t XFS-1.0.1 on 2.4.5 (score: 1)
Author: ltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:01:10 +0200
kernel summit, we just can's believe XFS has such a serious bug. For some reason, we must stick on 2.4.5-xfs-1.0.1. We have the sup
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg01004.html (10,394 bytes)

7. Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: Juha K Kallio <bunnyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:51:44 +0200
I got a kernel oops on the display this morning when i woke up. It had something about kupdated being killed, but i can't get the whole error, since it could't log anymore. Right after i tried to rea
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00265.html (6,742 bytes)

8. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:58:19 +1100
To do any debugging we need the first oops (all of it) run through ksymoops. Without that plus your kernel version, XFS version, gcc etc., there is no hope of debugging this.
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00266.html (7,410 bytes)

9. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: Juha K Kallio <bunnyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:52:18 +0200
I've never had a kernel oops before, so I'm really not experienced in debugging. But I have /var/log/ksymoops and some files in there, do I have to do something with those? Strangely, some of them ar
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00267.html (8,072 bytes)

10. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: Steeve McCauley <smccauley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:58:59 -0500
It's possible that the oops was not written to the syslog though and if that's the case and you do not have a photograhpic memory, you'll have to wait until it happens again (type in the oops or writ
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00268.html (9,445 bytes)

11. Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:51:44 +0200
I got a kernel oops on the display this morning when i woke up. It had something about kupdated being killed, but i can't get the whole error, since it could't log anymore. Right after i tried to rea
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00970.html (6,742 bytes)

12. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:58:19 +1100
To do any debugging we need the first oops (all of it) run through ksymoops. Without that plus your kernel version, XFS version, gcc etc., there is no hope of debugging this.
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00971.html (7,410 bytes)

13. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:52:18 +0200
I've never had a kernel oops before, so I'm really not experienced in debugging. But I have /var/log/ksymoops and some files in there, do I have to do something with those? Strangely, some of them ar
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00972.html (8,072 bytes)

14. Re: Kernel oops (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:58:59 -0500
It's possible that the oops was not written to the syslog though and if that's the case and you do not have a photograhpic memory, you'll have to wait until it happens again (type in the oops or writ
/archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00973.html (9,445 bytes)

15. kernel Oops (score: 1)
Author: "Christian, Chip" <chip_christian@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:48:55 -0500
We are running RedHat Linux 7.1 with XFS Release 1.0.2. Custom kernel built from kernel-source-2.4.9-12SGI_XFS_1.0.2. Got the following Oops(es) this am. Can anyone give me a hand tracking it down? T
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00084.html (16,343 bytes)

16. RE: kernel Oops (score: 1)
Author: "Christian, Chip" <chip_christian@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:42:28 -0500
Oh, and the compiler in use is gcc-2.96-85. We are running RedHat Linux 7.1 with XFS Release 1.0.2. Custom kernel built from kernel-source-2.4.9-12SGI_XFS_1.0.2. Got the following Oops(es) this am. C
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00091.html (16,578 bytes)

17. tem (score: 1)
Author: Dan Rich <drich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:45:31 -0800 (PST)
I'm seeing the following crash on my server. This system is a SMP system with a Highpoint IDE Raid controller and a Buslogic SCSI card (I'm mentioning that because the crash appears to go away if I r
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00361.html (10,343 bytes)

18. .95 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:37:42 -0600 (CST)
Please turn spinlock debugging off, it's not compatible with the way xfs handles signed chars... we need to do something about this some day. :) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00364.html (7,692 bytes)

19. re1 (score: 1)
Author: Dan Rich <drich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Ok, I did and that fixed *most* of my crashing. However, I still have the crash below when I'm trying to backup the system with amanda (in fact, this is the crash that got me to turn on spinlock debu
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00386.html (12,724 bytes)

20. OPS (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 19 Feb 2002 12:43:48 -0600
Hm, I've seen this before, but not here. I'll have to try to reproduce it locally to see what's going on. Does this happen every time you use amanda? And I assume you have amanda hooked up to use xfs
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00387.html (7,999 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]

This search system is powered by Namazu