Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kswapd\s+Oops\s+with\s+2\.4\.9\-31SGI_XFS_1\.1smp\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. FS server panics (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:32:00 -0400 (EDT)

s, glibc, and anything else I compile. so far so good without any compiler related issues AFAIK ATM. Nothing but *blazing* speed and usually good optimizations. -- A

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00477.html (10,904 bytes)

2. ilable.Are ther any plans for an XFS patch. (score: 1)

Author: r@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:03:29 +0200

g time ago (last was on xfs 1.0.2) This server is not using NFS se

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00480.html (8,659 bytes)

3. .9-31SGI_XFS_1.1smp (score: 1)

Author: r@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:19:19 -0400 (EDT)

and we wanted to use XFS. Our internal tests passed OK but when we installed first server at customer and migrated data an error occured (usually after copying 60-10

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00483.html (8,924 bytes)

4. of NFS server panics (score: 1)

Author: n <rep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:32:00 -0400 (EDT)

is with debugging as kdb doesn't always show the truth with anything but 2.91.66 -- Adrian Head (Public Key available on request.)

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00981.html (10,904 bytes)

5. 4.9-31SGI_XFS_1.1smp (score: 1)

Author: Vanek <libor@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:03:29 +0200

usually good optimizations. -- A

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00984.html (8,659 bytes)

6. s for an XFS patch. (score: 1)

Author: Vanek <libor@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:19:19 -0400 (EDT)

rnal tests passed OK but when we installed first server at customer and migrated data an error occured (usually after copying 60-1

/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00987.html (8,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]