Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*problem\s+for\s+xfs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. : XFS NFS and umask (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:11:06 +0800
Xing wrote: Thanks for your suggestion. My concern is that whether my current XFS 1.0.1 release may lose data for files opened as read-only. Someone has seen once o
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00454.html (6,815 bytes)

2. (score: 1)
Author: l@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:57:08 -0500 (CDT)
into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: xfs-cmds:slinx:122330a cmd/acl/doc/CHANGES - 1.35 cmd/acl/chacl/chacl.c - 1.15 - Minor update to make chacl b
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00459.html (7,728 bytes)

3. ersion number (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:11:06 +0800
er. I have searched the archive for a solution to the umask not being set properly on NFS mounted volumes. I am mounting the Linux
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00958.html (6,815 bytes)

4. ith new spinlock code (score: 1)
Author: ard <shepardl@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:57:08 -0500 (CDT)
.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:122302a linux/fs/xfs/support/spin.h - 1.7 - Include sched.h for the preempt case
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00963.html (7,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]


This search system is powered by Namazu