Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*problem\s+for\s+xfs\s*$/: 4 ]
Total 4 documents matching your query.
- 1. : XFS NFS and umask (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:11:06 +0800
- Xing wrote: Thanks for your suggestion. My concern is that whether my current XFS 1.0.1 release may lose data for files opened as read-only. Someone has seen once o
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00454.html (6,815 bytes)
- 2. (score: 1)
- Author: l@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:57:08 -0500 (CDT)
- into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: xfs-cmds:slinx:122330a cmd/acl/doc/CHANGES - 1.35 cmd/acl/chacl/chacl.c - 1.15 - Minor update to make chacl b
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00459.html (7,728 bytes)
- 3. ersion number (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:11:06 +0800
- er. I have searched the archive for a solution to the umask not being set properly on NFS mounted volumes. I am mounting the Linux
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00958.html (6,815 bytes)
- 4. ith new spinlock code (score: 1)
- Author: ard <shepardl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:57:08 -0500 (CDT)
- .com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:122302a linux/fs/xfs/support/spin.h - 1.7 - Include sched.h for the preempt case
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00963.html (7,728 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu