Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*process\s+hang\s+with\s+xfs\s+1\.0\.1\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:14:26 -0700

We run into a process hang, ps -elf shows the status as 'D'. The stack trace shows it might be xfs_read. We are running xfs 1.0.1 with a few more patches from the TAKES, see list below on powerpc li

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00386.html (13,285 bytes)

2. process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:12:46 -0700

We run into a process hang, ps -elf shows the status as 'D'. The stack trace shows it might be xfs_read. We are running xfs 1.0.1 with a few more patches from the TAKES, see list below on powerpc li

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00387.html (12,286 bytes)

3. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:55:13 +0000 (UTC)

Currently we see similar problems, reproducable. We run linux 2.4.5 with XFS 1.0.1 on a Dell P2550 SMP machine. Samba 2.2.1a acts as the Windows file server. The error (smbd in "D" state) occurs whe

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00395.html (9,176 bytes)

4. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:03:26 -0500

In general I would recommend trying a newer kernel in situations like this. There are plenty of bugfixes in both the mainline kernel and the xfs code itself - we do not have the resources to backpor

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00397.html (9,851 bytes)

5. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:12:27 +0000 (UTC)

I know, I tried 2.4.12 but the aacraid patch for the Dell RAID controller didn't work. :-( So I had to stick with 2.4.5, and XFS 1.0.1 and 2.4.5 is the official XFS release by SGI, so it should work,

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00398.html (9,437 bytes)

6. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:26:54 -0500

Well, the only things we touch in the kernel are XFS and some small changes to the mainline kernel to make the interfaces we need available to user space and some extensions in the buffer cache and

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00399.html (10,745 bytes)

7. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 17:01:45 +0200

OK, it doesn't seem to be XFS related, as the problem also occurs on a Samba share with an underlying ext2fs. Crazy, crazy... Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformati

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00400.html (9,266 bytes)

8. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:58:09 +0200

OK, using 2.4.12 or later was not an option because the aacraid patch for the Dell RAID controller was not working. But with 2.4.7 this particular problem went away now. Greetings -- Robert Sander Co

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00401.html (9,942 bytes)

9. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 00:14:34 +0200

At 09:26 13-10-2001 -0500, Steve Lord wrote: The 2.4.3 kernel rpm in 1.0.1 is a modification of the redhat 7.1 kernel, the 2.4.5 kernel is a vanilla linux kernel. We are working on getting things goi

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00406.html (10,572 bytes)

10. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:22:38 -0700

Robert Sander wrote: OK, using 2.4.12 or later was not an option because the aacraid patch for the Dell RAID controller was not working. But with 2.4.7 this particular problem went away now. Robert,

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00407.html (9,054 bytes)

11. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:35:48 +0200

No, I took the patch for 2.4.7 from oss.sgi.com, I think all these patches are "just" minor changes from 1.0.1 to match the current kernel and have some bug fixes in them. Greetings -- Robert Sander

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00447.html (9,642 bytes)

12. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:20:43 -0800

.

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01017.html (10,031 bytes)

13. process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:14:26 -0700

r

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01466.html (13,285 bytes)

14. process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Amit D Chaudhary <amitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:12:46 -0700

i

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01467.html (12,286 bytes)

15. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:55:13 +0000 (UTC)

.

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01475.html (9,176 bytes)

16. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:03:26 -0500

u

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01477.html (9,851 bytes)

17. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:12:27 +0000 (UTC)

r

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01478.html (9,437 bytes)

18. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:26:54 -0500

,

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01479.html (10,745 bytes)

19. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 17:01:45 +0200

d

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01480.html (9,266 bytes)

20. Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 (score: 1)

Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:58:09 +0200

i

/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01481.html (9,942 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]