Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stress\s+test\s+failures\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stress\s+test\s+failures\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:43:30 +0100; I got a failure on test 020, short version: 020 - output mismatch (see 020.out.bad) 65a66,68 020.out.bad attached. 051 also fails: 051 - output mismatch (see 051.out.bad) 24c24 < sh: ./file1: Permis; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00059.html (9,343 bytes)
2. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:59:36 -0600; For test 51 to run you need a kernel with the acl code built in, there is a posix_acl config option near the top of filesystems config. Also, for both tests do you have the latest version of the acl; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00061.html (15,177 bytes)
3. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:30:19 +0100; CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y -- snip! -- == dist, log is Logs/dist Wrote: /v/techno/fs1/proj/marcelo/xfs/user-space/attr/build/tar/attr-1.0.1.tar.gz Wrote: /v/techno/fs1/proj/marcelo/xfs/user-space/attr/bu; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00062.html (9,766 bytes)
4. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:47:57 -0600; Does this mean you were already running with the latest version of everything when you saw the problem? If so, I have to leave this up to the capable folks in the Melbourne office. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00067.html (9,929 bytes)
5. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:00:42 +1100 (EDT); Hi Marcelo, Looking at 020, the test is testing setting a long value for the extended attribute. It does this by trying to set a value of 100K worth of zeroes. The attr(1) code truncates this to ATTR; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00073.html (10,199 bytes)
6. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:59:32 +0100; I'm not getting that. The problem is runas uses system. It eventually executes /bin/sh, which is a symlink to bash, which in turn will reset privileges on start up (a patched bash might not do this; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00077.html (9,386 bytes)
7. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +0100; Just a follow up. With these version of runas 051 succeeds, more or less. Using system(3) you are calling the shell which outputs something along the lines of: sh: ./file1: Permission denied I didn'; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00085.html (9,167 bytes)
8. stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:43:30 +0100; I got a failure on test 020, short version: 020 - output mismatch (see 020.out.bad) 65a66,68 020.out.bad attached. 051 also fails: 051 - output mismatch (see 051.out.bad) 24c24 < sh: ./file1: Permis; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00518.html (9,343 bytes)
9. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:59:36 -0600; For test 51 to run you need a kernel with the acl code built in, there is a posix_acl config option near the top of filesystems config. Also, for both tests do you have the latest version of the acl; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00520.html (15,177 bytes)
10. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:30:19 +0100; CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y -- snip! -- == dist, log is Logs/dist Wrote: /v/techno/fs1/proj/marcelo/xfs/user-space/attr/build/tar/attr-1.0.1.tar.gz Wrote: /v/techno/fs1/proj/marcelo/xfs/user-space/attr/bu; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00521.html (9,766 bytes)
11. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:47:57 -0600; Does this mean you were already running with the latest version of everything when you saw the problem? If so, I have to leave this up to the capable folks in the Melbourne office. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00526.html (9,929 bytes)
12. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:00:42 +1100 (EDT); Hi Marcelo, Looking at 020, the test is testing setting a long value for the extended attribute. It does this by trying to set a value of 100K worth of zeroes. The attr(1) code truncates this to ATTR; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00532.html (10,199 bytes)
13. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:59:32 +0100; I'm not getting that. The problem is runas uses system. It eventually executes /bin/sh, which is a symlink to bash, which in turn will reset privileges on start up (a patched bash might not do this; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00536.html (9,386 bytes)
14. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +0100; Just a follow up. With these version of runas 051 succeeds, more or less. Using system(3) you are calling the shell which outputs something along the lines of: sh: ./file1: Permission denied I didn'; /archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00544.html (9,167 bytes)
15. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:34:32 +0100; The reported failure involving mmap is no longer reproducible. From last night's run I have: Not run: 022 023 024 025 035 036 037 038 039 040 043 044 Failures: 020 026 028 046 047 Failed 5 of 35 tes; /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00032.html (8,809 bytes)
16. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Timothy Shimmin); Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:19 +1100 (EDT); Hi Marcelo, Your xfsdump/xfsrestore failures of: 026, 028, 046, 047 are all consistent with not being able to read the dump inventory. 028/047 which test out xfsinvutil do an "xfsdump -I" before and; /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00038.html (9,597 bytes)
17. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:34:32 +0100; The reported failure involving mmap is no longer reproducible. From last night's run I have: Not run: 022 023 024 025 035 036 037 038 039 040 043 044 Failures: 020 026 028 046 047 Failed 5 of 35 tes; /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00277.html (8,809 bytes)
18. Re: stress test failures (score: 1): Author: tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Timothy Shimmin); Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:19 +1100 (EDT); Hi Marcelo, Your xfsdump/xfsrestore failures of: 026, 028, 046, 047 are all consistent with not being able to read the dump inventory. 028/047 which test out xfsinvutil do an "xfsdump -I" before and; /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00283.html (9,597 bytes)
19. stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:49:10 +0100; I've been running the stress tests on a daily basis for a while now and most failures have dissapered lately. A couple of them are errors in the test scripts, but I've got six that look like either; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00215.html (8,449 bytes)
20. stress test failures (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:49:10 +0100; I've been running the stress tests on a daily basis for a while now and most failures have dissapered lately. A couple of them are errors in the test scripts, but I've got six that look like either; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00435.html (8,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]