Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+218\]\s+Probable\s+mmap\s+bug\s+that\s+breaks\s+cpp\-3\.2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+218\]\s+Probable\s+mmap\s+bug\s+that\s+breaks\s+cpp\-3\.2\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:59:49 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-10 03:59 -- Ugh, almost certainly this is my fault. There was just some reworking of this path. I must; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00094.html (8,003 bytes)
2. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:04:17 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From erayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-02-10 11:04 -- Since I trust you guys, I just ran mapcheck --all after I saw that it detected; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00108.html (8,145 bytes)
3. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:18:02 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 lord@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-25 11:18 -- This; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00426.html (8,129 bytes)
4. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:38:59 -0800; mapcheck is required to fix this? doesn't this mean a malicious user and cause this lockup still? --cw; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00430.html (8,482 bytes)
5. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2003 15:45:14 -0600; Nope, the problem was this filesystem was last running a kernel from the time period where that bug was present. So there were a bunch of files in this state. Running mapcheck cleaned up the filesyst; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00432.html (9,231 bytes)
6. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:51:41 -0800; I'm confused.... i read it as, 'new kernel, will deadlock, mapcheck fixes this'. So I assumed I could store data past EOF and still confuse a new kernel. I was wrong I take it? --cw; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00433.html (8,995 bytes)
7. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2003 16:00:03 -0600; Nope, old kernel created bad files, confused cpp in gcc 3.2, new kernel does not generate these files. mapcheck fixes up old files/ Yep. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer,; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00435.html (9,593 bytes)
8. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:41 -0800; might xfs_check / xfs_repair not also be a candidate for trying to find such files? ie. check a few at random (maybe using ctime/mtime hints) or a command-line option to 'look harder' or would such c; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00438.html (9,190 bytes)
9. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:59:49 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-10 03:59 -- Ugh, almost certainly this is my fault. There was just some reworking of this path. I must; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00578.html (8,003 bytes)
10. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:04:17 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From erayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-02-10 11:04 -- Since I trust you guys, I just ran mapcheck --all after I saw that it detected; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00592.html (8,145 bytes)
11. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:18:02 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 lord@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-25 11:18 -- This; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00910.html (8,129 bytes)
12. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:38:59 -0800; mapcheck is required to fix this? doesn't this mean a malicious user and cause this lockup still? --cw; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00914.html (8,482 bytes)
13. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2003 15:45:14 -0600; Nope, the problem was this filesystem was last running a kernel from the time period where that bug was present. So there were a bunch of files in this state. Running mapcheck cleaned up the filesyst; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00916.html (9,231 bytes)
14. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:51:41 -0800; I'm confused.... i read it as, 'new kernel, will deadlock, mapcheck fixes this'. So I assumed I could store data past EOF and still confuse a new kernel. I was wrong I take it? --cw; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00917.html (8,995 bytes)
15. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2003 16:00:03 -0600; Nope, old kernel created bad files, confused cpp in gcc 3.2, new kernel does not generate these files. mapcheck fixes up old files/ Yep. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer,; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00919.html (9,593 bytes)
16. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:41 -0800; might xfs_check / xfs_repair not also be a candidate for trying to find such files? ie. check a few at random (maybe using ctime/mtime hints) or a command-line option to 'look harder' or would such c; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00922.html (9,190 bytes)
17. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:59:49 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-10 03:59 -- Ugh, almost certainly this is my fault. There was just some reworking of this path. I must; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01062.html (8,018 bytes)
18. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:04:17 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 -- Additional Comments From erayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-02-10 11:04 -- Since I trust you guys, I just ran mapcheck --all after I saw that it detected; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01076.html (8,160 bytes)
19. [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:18:02 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218 lord@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2003-02-25 11:18 -- This; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01394.html (8,144 bytes)
20. Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2 (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:38:59 -0800; mapcheck is required to fix this? doesn't this mean a malicious user and cause this lockup still? --cw; /archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01398.html (8,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]