Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+PULL\]\s+XFS\s+update\s+for\s+2\.6\.29\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:45:22 +1100
x
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01217.html (9,530 bytes)

22. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:50:18 -0800 (PST)
r
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01218.html (8,173 bytes)

23. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:39:22 -0800 (PST)
s
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01219.html (8,127 bytes)

24. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:58:04 +1100
s
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01220.html (8,897 bytes)

25. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:50:52 +0100 (CET)
On m68k, with CONFIG_LBD=n: range of data type range of data type left/right = xfs_fsblock_t (32 or 64 bit), NULLDFSBNO = xfs_dfsbno_t (64 bit) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00650.html (8,972 bytes)

26. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:03:29 -0500
Hmm, can't reproduce it here with CONFIG_LBD=n on x86, but the following patch should fix it: Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c == -- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c 2009-01-01 15:57:04.606547140
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00651.html (9,896 bytes)

27. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:57:43 +0100 (CET)
x86-32 or -64? It may also depend on the compiler version. I have gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21). Yep, the warning is good. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00685.html (9,818 bytes)

28. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:58:42 -0500
32 bit, gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1)
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00686.html (9,194 bytes)

29. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:27:27 +1100
Nick Piggin wrote: On Tuesday 30 December 2008 14:08:45 Lachlan McIlroy wrote: The following changes since commit 3c92ec8ae91ecf59d88c798301833d7cf83f2179: Linus Torvalds (1): Merge branch 'next' of
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00711.html (9,040 bytes)

30. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:38:13 +0100 (CET)
^^^^ gone JFYI, the bug has entered Linus' tree. The fix hasn't. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00885.html (10,424 bytes)

31. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:45:23 -0500
I sent the patch when you told me about it, but I'm not the maintainer so I can't pus it myself.
/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00887.html (9,252 bytes)

32. [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: lachlan@xxxxxxx (Lachlan McIlroy)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:08:45 +1100
The following changes since commit 3c92ec8ae91ecf59d88c798301833d7cf83f2179: Linus Torvalds (1): Merge branch 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/.../paulus/powerpc are available in the git repository at:
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01796.html (23,175 bytes)

33. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:45:22 +1100
are available in the git repository at: git://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/xfs/xfs.git for-linus Not to me they aren't: fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Hmm? Linus, Could you please try git://oss.sg
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01834.html (9,518 bytes)

34. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Yup, that works. Thanks, Linus
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01835.html (8,298 bytes)

35. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Not to me they aren't: fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Hmm? Linus
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01836.html (8,197 bytes)

36. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:58:04 +1100
git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-linus (the /oss/git prefix is needed for ssh - I should have noticed that) Yup, that works. Thanks, Linus Thanks Linus. Sorry for the mistake. We really needed to ge
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01837.html (9,076 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu