Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+PULL\]\s+XFS\s+update\s+for\s+2\.6\.33\-rc1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+PULL\]\s+XFS\s+update\s+for\s+2\.6\.33\-rc1\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:26 -0600; The following changes since commit 22763c5cf3690a681551162c15d34d935308c8d7: Linus Torvalds (1): Linux 2.6.32 are available in the git repository at: git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs for-linus Alex Elder (1; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00091.html (9,869 bytes)
2. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:30:48 -0800 (PST); Hmm. There seems to be a lot of duplicate commits there due to something odd going on: rebasing _and_ then merging the rebased end result. IOW, these are all duplicates: xfs: cleanup data end I/O han; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00111.html (9,204 bytes)
3. [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:01:01 -0600; This is a rather pervasive change to XFS code that switches it from using its own internal tracing mechanism to instead use the tracepoint support provided elsewhere in the kernel. Please pull this i; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00158.html (10,961 bytes)
4. [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:26:10 -0600; One more XFS update for -rc1, now that the new XFS tracing code has been committed. -Alex The following changes since commit 5ac4d630eb87656bd4dc313b910776d54d88ea28: Linus Torvalds (1): Merge branch; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00170.html (8,210 bytes)
5. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:55:12 -0800; Sorry if I have missed it, but have the printk format warnings on i386 builds been fixed? e.g.: In file included from linux-next-20091216/include/trace/ftrace.h:398, from linux-next-20091216/include/; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00171.html (16,241 bytes)
6. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:20:07 +1100; I don't see any here w/ gcc 4.3.4 x86-64 compiling i386 kernels.... /me hates gcc's warning inconsistencies with a passion. Patch that should fix this below. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxx; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00172.html (11,436 bytes)
7. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:56:16 -0800; Yes, thanks for that. Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00173.html (9,966 bytes)
8. RE: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:41:12 -0600; I didn't get them either when I built in my environment. Dave, your patch looks good to me, and Randy has acked it so I'm going to pull it into our XFS top-of-tree. I'll hold off sending yet another; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00174.html (10,036 bytes)
9. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:44:28 -0800; Hi Alex, Dave's patch is now needed in Linus's mainline kernel tree... -- ~Randy; /archives/xfs/2010-01/msg00104.html (10,067 bytes)
10. RE: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1 (score: 1): Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:09:54 -0600; Yes, I noticed that. I forgot I hadn't requested it get pulled. Sorry. Working on that today. -Alex; /archives/xfs/2010-01/msg00106.html (10,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]