Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+PULL\]\s+XFS\s+update\s+for\s+2\.6\.38\-rc3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+PULL\]\s+XFS\s+update\s+for\s+2\.6\.38\-rc3\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3 (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:42:33 -0600; Linus, please accept the following updates for XFS, for 2.6.38-rc3 (if it's not too late) or 2.6.38-rc4. They are all fixes for bugs that have some pretty undesirable consequences. They address: - On; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00497.html (8,142 bytes)
2. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3 (score: 1): Author: Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:00:33 -0500; Are these bugs all new in 2.6.38, or should some of these fixes also go out to -stable for earlier revisions?; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00003.html (8,444 bytes)
3. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3 (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:07:57 +1100; Been there for years, extremely hard to hit, so no. -38-rc1 regression, so no. Been there for years in little used functionality, so no. Introduced with new code in 2.6.35, hard to hit, only results; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00036.html (9,641 bytes)
4. Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3 (score: 1): Author: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:02:31 +0100; [...] Definitely, xfs_fsr can hit this even few times a day (happened already). Stable team, please include this one for 2.6.37.1: xfs: fix dquot shaker deadlock Commit 368e136 ("xfs: remove duplicat; /archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00046.html (11,173 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]