Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[GIT\s+Review\]\s+xfs\:\s+2\.6\.36\s+fixes\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:44:45 +1000
Folks, Can you please cast an eye over the the tree below to check that all the bug fixes that need to go into 2.6.36 are there? If so, I'll send a pull request to Linus tomorrow. Note that these are
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00251.html (7,766 bytes)

2. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:12:33 -0400
The tree looks good to me.
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00254.html (7,148 bytes)

3. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:54:58 -0500
All of these commits look good to me. I will have these and all the rest published on the oss.sgi.com tree later this week. I've been on vacation and have gotten behind. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aeld
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00256.html (8,208 bytes)

4. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:10:28 +1000
I'm going to send the pull to Linus, anyway, Alex. The problem is deeper than "been on vacation" - regardless of whether you are on vacation we can't rely on you to do anything immediately. It might
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00257.html (10,185 bytes)

5. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:50:32 +1000
So this doesn't get taken the wrong way, this is not a comment on the quality of the work you do, Alex. My concern is the limited amount of time you have available to do the required work and avoidin
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00258.html (9,416 bytes)

6. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:17:26 -0500
all been -rc1), This has been an ongoing issue, and I concur that it's been a matter of giving XFS maintenance the time and attention it requires. In July I raised this issue internally and got agree
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00266.html (11,435 bytes)

7. Re: [GIT Review] xfs: 2.6.36 fixes (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:13:52 +1000
Wonderful news, Alex! I can't think of a better way to address my concerns. /me does a happy dance I'd suggest that one thing we really need to do first is work out a semi-coherent development roadma
/archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00267.html (12,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu