Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[META\-LIST\]\s+Now\:\s+perennial\s+\"reply\-to\-all\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[META\-LIST\]\s+Now\:\s+perennial\s+\"reply\-to\-all\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all" (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:32:02 +0200; I'm also on several lists, but the only list where reply-to-all is used is this one - so I followed the way it's done here without having questioned why. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monneri; /archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00171.html (9,812 bytes)
2. Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all" (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:01:50 -0400; It's done by all Lists in the Linux development universe, and it's the only sane way to handle a list. We don't require people to subsribe to post to the list, and keeping everyone in the To/Cc list; /archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00175.html (9,659 bytes)
3. Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all" (score: 1): Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:16:00 -0500; Christoph Hellwig put forth on 8/17/2010 4:01 AM: Thanks Christoph. That makes sense. -- Stan; /archives/xfs/2010-08/msg00183.html (10,108 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]