Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OOPS\]\s+XFS\s+in\s+large\s+Maildir\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OOPS\]\s+XFS\s+in\s+large\s+Maildir\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:51:39 +1000; Hi guys, I've attached the ksymoops output from Linux 2.4.6-pre3-xfs (CVS tree from some point). I'll try an update now, but when I try to access stuff in ~/Maildir/netfilter/cur (~7k files in it), X; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00863.html (8,300 bytes)
2. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:18:00 +0200 (CEST); Have you tried running xfs_repair -n on the filesystem to see if something is wrong? Was the kernel compiled with 2.96-?? of 2.91.66?; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00866.html (7,969 bytes)
3. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:52:53 +1000; I haven't tried anything on the filesystem yet, and it was compiled with Debian (sid aka unstable)'s 2.95.3 snapshot. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz???; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00869.html (9,321 bytes)
4. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:07:40 +0200 (CEST); if you can run xfs_repair -n to see if it produces error output. xfs_repair -n works on a mounted filesystem but does not change anything. If you do see errors you need to unmount the fs and run xfs_; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00870.html (8,837 bytes)
5. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:31:51 +1000; Er, it's the latest from unstable, whichever one that happens to be. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz????? /MSG ME!!"; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00872.html (10,278 bytes)
6. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:19:19 +1000; xfs_repair saw nothing, and it works just fine with -pre5-xfs. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz????? /MSG ME!!"; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00874.html (9,231 bytes)
7. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:14:41 +0200 (CEST); It might be that some general compiler bugs are still being fixed in the linus tree. There a lot of people out their that test various compilers. The linus kernel also had a lot of compiler fixes. Hi; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00875.html (8,573 bytes)
8. [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:51:39 +1000; Hi guys, I've attached the ksymoops output from Linux 2.4.6-pre3-xfs (CVS tree from some point). I'll try an update now, but when I try to access stuff in ~/Maildir/netfilter/cur (~7k files in it), X; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02033.html (8,300 bytes)
9. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:18:00 +0200 (CEST); Have you tried running xfs_repair -n on the filesystem to see if something is wrong? Was the kernel compiled with 2.96-?? of 2.91.66?; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02036.html (7,969 bytes)
10. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:52:53 +1000; I haven't tried anything on the filesystem yet, and it was compiled with Debian (sid aka unstable)'s 2.95.3 snapshot. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz???; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02039.html (9,321 bytes)
11. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:07:40 +0200 (CEST); if you can run xfs_repair -n to see if it produces error output. xfs_repair -n works on a mounted filesystem but does not change anything. If you do see errors you need to unmount the fs and run xfs_; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02040.html (8,837 bytes)
12. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:31:51 +1000; Er, it's the latest from unstable, whichever one that happens to be. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz????? /MSG ME!!"; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02042.html (10,278 bytes)
13. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:19:19 +1000; xfs_repair saw nothing, and it works just fine with -pre5-xfs. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> <Nuke> "can NE1 help me aim nuclear weaponz????? /MSG ME!!"; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02044.html (9,231 bytes)
14. Re: [OOPS] XFS in large Maildir (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:14:41 +0200 (CEST); It might be that some general compiler bugs are still being fixed in the linus tree. There a lot of people out their that test various compilers. The linus kernel also had a lot of compiler fixes. Hi; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02045.html (8,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]