Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,\s+RFC\]\s+xfs\:\s+event\s+tracing\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,\s+RFC\]\s+xfs\:\s+event\s+tracing\s+support\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:01:35 -0500; Convert the old xfs tracing support that could only be used with the out of tree kdb and xfsidbg patches to use the generic event tracer. To use it make sure CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING is enabled and then; /archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00278.html (8,781 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:59:04 -0400; IA64 ftrace support was added earlier this year, but it seems it can't be enabled anymore since the big config option reshuffle. Now tracing support requires the architecture to define the TRACE_IRQF; /archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00280.html (9,442 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:37:12 -0500; echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs/enable Does event tracing work on ia64 platform? I spent some time on it over weekend, but was not able even to force "CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING=y" setting in; /archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00281.html (10,127 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:22:39 -0500; Where are we at with this one, I'd like to get this in for XFS but I agree w/ Felix that throwing out a "working" trace infrastructure w/ nothing to replace it on ia64 would not be great. Is this jus; /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00154.html (8,997 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:35:27 -0400 (EDT); Added Ingo as well. For PPC32, we have stacktrace support but there was lots of issues with the IRQFLAGS support. Namely, issues with handling traces in assembly when interrupts are off. Hence, we ha; /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00155.html (9,665 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: event tracing support (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:09:55 -0400; Well, it's not actuall working in these sense of that it isn't and never has been in mainline and also is utterly bit-rotted. I have absolutely no interested in keeping a tracing implementation away; /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00162.html (8,813 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]