Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[1\/4\]\s+b44\:\s+Ignore\s+carrier\s+lost\s+errors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[1\/4\]\s+b44\:\s+Ignore\s+carrier\s+lost\s+errors\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:54:47 -0400; m: Micr; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00716.html (8,455 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:00:36 -0400; xxxx> p; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00718.html (9,013 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: kas <zilvinas@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:00:24 -0400; n broke; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00719.html (9,422 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: arzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:02:57 -0400; erence.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00721.html (8,900 bytes)
5. [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:33:00 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00751.html (9,687 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:49:28 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00756.html (9,602 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:04:24 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00758.html (10,319 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: atrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:45:28 -0700; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00766.html (9,507 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: s Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:49:28 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00767.html (9,961 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:10:20 +0300; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00773.html (15,490 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:04:14 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00775.html (10,992 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:54:47 -0400; some (?) hardware seems to be buggy and is reporting bogus carrier lost values. Both reference implementations from Broadcom indicate that this counter is not reliable and therefore ignore it. We sho; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02172.html (8,618 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:00:36 -0400; Sorry for that. KMail seems to mangle the message as soon as you sign it. Please find the non broken versions attached to this mail. I think Florian's changes are fine. BTW, can someone fixup someth; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02174.html (9,273 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:00:24 -0400; BTW, can someone fixup something for me? Update MODULE_AUTHOR() please :-) 3/4 of this driver have been rewritten since I last touched it, heh. hehe. I'll take care of it tonight when I queue Floria; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02175.html (9,852 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:02:57 -0400; Florian, I was unable to apply your patch #3 (phy-less-mode) and patch #4 (bcm47xx support). Could you please resend these two patches, diff'd against the attached b44 driver (my current version in n; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02177.html (9,226 bytes)
16. [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Florian Schirmer <jolt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:33:00 +0200; Hi, some (?) hardware seems to be buggy and is reporting bogus carrier lost values. Both reference implementations from Broadcom indicate that this counter is not reliable and therefore ignore it. We; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01642.html (9,749 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:49:28 -0400; Your mailer is mangling the patches. Can you please resend without this? The patches need to be apply-able without MIME massaging. Jeff =2D-- linux/drivers/net/b44.c-old1 2004-08-29 16:29:08.00000000; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01647.html (9,503 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Florian Schirmer <jolt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:04:24 +0200; Hi, Sorry for that. KMail seems to mangle the message as soon as you sign it. Please find the non broken versions attached to this mail. Sorry, Florian Attachment: b44-1-broken-carrier-lost.patch Des; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01649.html (10,429 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:45:28 -0700; I think Florian's changes are fine. BTW, can someone fixup something for me? Update MODULE_AUTHOR() please :-) 3/4 of this driver have been rewritten since I last touched it, heh.; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01657.html (9,655 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:49:28 -0400; hehe. I'll take care of it tonight when I queue Florian's stuff to netdev-2.6 (and thus -mm, and thus eventually mainline). Jeff; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01658.html (10,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]