Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[RFC\s+3\]\s+cleaning\s+up\s+struct\s+sock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[RFC\s+3\]\s+cleaning\s+up\s+struct\s+sock\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: sov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:23:39 -0200; Ok, patch for 2.5.1, without the bogus cvs $id strings hunks, being used in this machine now. Available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/ sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00080.html (11,972 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:21:26 -0800 (PST); Available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/ sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2 Looking pretty good. I have one improvement. I'd rather you pass the "kmem_cache_t" directly; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00081.html (10,349 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: sov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:37:59 -0200; Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: humm I did that with sock_register to avoid changing all the sk_alloc users, but in the end all protocols were changed so... ok, I'; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00087.html (12,097 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: sov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:54:38 -0200; Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: Indeed it wastes, but the current setup in the stock kernel wastes even more ;) Well, did what you suggested, adding a slab paramet; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00090.html (12,635 bytes)
5. [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:23:39 -0200; Ok, patch for 2.5.1, without the bogus cvs $id strings hunks, being used in this machine now. Available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/ sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00177.html (12,174 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:21:26 -0800 (PST); Available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/ sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2 Looking pretty good. I have one improvement. I'd rather you pass the "kmem_cache_t" directly; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00178.html (10,484 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:37:59 -0200; Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: humm I did that with sock_register to avoid changing all the sk_alloc users, but in the end all protocols were changed so... ok, I'; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00184.html (12,283 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:54:38 -0200; Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: Indeed it wastes, but the current setup in the stock kernel wastes even more ;) Well, did what you suggested, adding a slab paramet; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00187.html (12,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]