Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Give\s+a\s+transaction\s+to\s+xfs_attr_set

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Give\s+a\s+transaction\s+to\s+xfs_attr_set_int\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400; Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00011.html (8,605 bytes)
2. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000; We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00160.html (18,828 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000; Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00199.html (10,056 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400; Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00200.html (10,634 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400; Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00634.html (8,605 bytes)
6. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000; We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00783.html (18,828 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000; Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00822.html (10,056 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400; Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00823.html (10,634 bytes)
9. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000; We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00257.html (19,923 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000; As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00436.html (12,209 bytes)
11. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000; We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00717.html (19,923 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000; As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00896.html (12,209 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400; Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01257.html (9,091 bytes)
14. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000; We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01406.html (19,132 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000; Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01445.html (10,406 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400; Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01446.html (10,982 bytes)
17. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000; We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01177.html (20,153 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000; As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01356.html (12,485 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]