Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Give\s+a\s+transaction\s+to\s+xfs_attr_set_int\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400
Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00011.html (8,605 bytes)

2. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000
We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00160.html (18,828 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000
Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00199.html (10,056 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400
Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00200.html (10,634 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400
Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00634.html (8,605 bytes)

6. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000
We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00783.html (18,828 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000
Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00822.html (10,056 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400
Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00823.html (10,634 bytes)

9. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000
We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00257.html (19,923 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000
As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00436.html (12,209 bytes)

11. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000
We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00717.html (19,923 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000
As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00896.html (12,209 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:49:46 -0400
Niv: Why not return the pointer as a return value? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Humans were created by water to transport it upward.
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01257.html (9,091 bytes)

14. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:39:05 +1000
We introduce xfs_attr_set_int_trans that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_trans_roll to do the tr
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01406.html (19,132 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:44:39 +1000
Ok, so following are 2 patches that will, export xfs_attr_set_int_trans, and use it where we would use it in Parent Pointers (and V4ACL to what I understand). This exposes the bug that I refered to b
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01445.html (10,406 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:59:56 -0400
Actually plain Posix ACLs and selinux need it too to guarantee atomicy. See xfs_init_security() and whatever _ACL_INHERIT expans to in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c. These might be good testcases to ge
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01446.html (10,982 bytes)

17. [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:42:30 +1000
We introduce xfs_trans_attr_set_int that takes a transaction pointer as an argument (or creates one if NULL) and only finishes the transaction if it has created it. We use xfs_attr_rolltrans to do th
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01177.html (20,153 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH] Give a transaction to xfs_attr_set_int (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:08:59 +1000
As a general comment to the entire patch set, I dislike the namespace pollution caused by changing xfs_attr_... to xfs_trans_attr... The xfs_trans_... namespace is used for stuff inside xfs_trans*[ch
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01356.html (12,485 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu