Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Improve\s+behaviour\s+of\s+Netlink\s+Sockets\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Improve\s+behaviour\s+of\s+Netlink\s+Sockets\s*$/: 186 ]

Total 186 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 29 Sep 2004 09:55:06 -0400; Probably not a good fit. A good fit (not sure how to create the race) is to have (handwave to illustrate) 1000 netdevices getting downed. You get notified of first 50, overrun happens, then you get l; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02821.html (15,888 bytes)
182. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: James Chapman <jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:50:09 +0100; Looks like I was proposing something similar to Jamal's intermediate queue. With the above scheme, there would be no need for userspace to periodically poll for events since that would be kicked off; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02881.html (9,995 bytes)
183. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:37:45 +0200; Hi Davem, Is a 2.4.x version possible? Attached the 2.4.x version. It just spawns one kernel thread called netlink, is it ok? regards, Pablo -- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2004-08-28 05:35:35.00000000; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01659.html (14,580 bytes)
184. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:20:29 -0700; It's fine, I'm going to make 2 minor fixes: 1) Mark netlink_thread() function static. 2) Name the thread "knetlinkd" to be consistent with other kernel thread names. Thanks Pablo.; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01712.html (8,807 bytes)
185. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:37:53 +0200; Hi Davem, Attached the 2.4.x version. It just spawns one kernel thread called netlink, is it ok? It's fine, I'm going to make 2 minor fixes: 1) Mark netlink_thread() function static. 2) Name the thre; /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01756.html (15,446 bytes)
186. Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:16:18 -0700; You misunderstood, I made these fixes for you in my tree :); /archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01766.html (9,261 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 186
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]