Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Timothy Shimmin wrote: David Chinner wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:55:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: This should f
heh, thanks Mark. Even though it's only CORRUPTION ON ARM I guess the shouting worked. :) Seriously though if you guys have any problems with it please let me know but I don't want it to just get dro
because __on_disk implies that it's on disk. __arch_pack means that it's packed on some arches. Not the same thing. If anyone wants to change the name to __purple_ponies or whatever that's fine, but
Eric Sandeen wrote: heh, thanks Mark. Even though it's only CORRUPTION ON ARM I guess the shouting worked. :) Well, we're dealing with apparent insidious corruption after failed btree AG allocations
Just realized you can't read the ils threads. But you can read this one: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/13268 -- Mark Mark Goodwin wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: heh, thanks
nah it's easier to hit than that. Just run xfs-qa on arm with old abi and you'll hit it plenty quickly. there are other calculations around that assume no padding. Even if it doesn't look corrupted o
seriously, if you don't like the name or the style of the fix that's fine, we can fix that up, but I went to enough trouble to track down the issue and test the fix it seems worth actually... fixing
Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Timothy Shimmin wrote: David Chinner wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:55:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: This should f
heh, thanks Mark. Even though it's only CORRUPTION ON ARM I guess the shouting worked. :) Seriously though if you guys have any problems with it please let me know but I don't want it to just get dro
because __on_disk implies that it's on disk. __arch_pack means that it's packed on some arches. Not the same thing. If anyone wants to change the name to __purple_ponies or whatever that's fine, but
Eric Sandeen wrote: heh, thanks Mark. Even though it's only CORRUPTION ON ARM I guess the shouting worked. :) Well, we're dealing with apparent insidious corruption after failed btree AG allocations
Just realized you can't read the ils threads. But you can read this one: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/13268 -- Mark Mark Goodwin wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: heh, thanks
nah it's easier to hit than that. Just run xfs-qa on arm with old abi and you'll hit it plenty quickly. there are other calculations around that assume no padding. Even if it doesn't look corrupted o
seriously, if you don't like the name or the style of the fix that's fine, we can fix that up, but I went to enough trouble to track down the issue and test the fix it seems worth actually... fixing