Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+forcedeth\:\s+fix\s+random\s+memory\s+scribbling\s+bug\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+forcedeth\:\s+fix\s+random\s+memory\s+scribbling\s+bug\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:19:24 +0100; Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it causes random memory corruptions on systems; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00003.html (11,914 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:09:31 -0500; Manfred Spraul wrote: Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it causes random memory c; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00004.html (9,655 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:08:10 +0100; Jeff Garzik wrote: Manfred Spraul wrote: Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it cau; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00005.html (11,123 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:52:25 -0800 (PST); Good catch. Btw, should we perhaps disallow (or at least WARN_ON()) pci_map_single() with a length of zero? I think it's always likely a bug.. However, that "skb->end - skb->data" calculation is a bi; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00006.html (9,600 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:56:00 +0100; Linus Torvalds wrote: Of course, on the alloc path, it seems to add an additional "NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD" thing, so maybe the "end-data" thing makes sense. The problem is the pci_unmap_single() call that h; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00007.html (9,568 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:57:48 -0800 (PST); These proper text encodings are easy to _apply_, because the raw email is uncorrupted. However, attachments are still broken for a very fundamental reason: basically no email client will ever quote t; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00008.html (9,588 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:58:26 -0500; "skb->end - skb->data" calculation is a bit strange. It correctly maps the whole skb, but nod wouldn't it make more sense to use the length we actually tell the card to use? In other words, wouldn't; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00009.html (9,953 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:41:35 -0800 (PST); Fair enough. Patch applied. Linus; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00010.html (9,481 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:06:02 -0500; Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Manfred Spraul wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: Of course, on the alloc path, it seems to add an additional "NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD" thing, so maybe the "end-data" thi; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00011.html (10,378 bytes)
10. [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:19:24 +0100; Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it causes random memory corruptions on systems; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00015.html (11,929 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:09:31 -0500; Manfred Spraul wrote: Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it causes random memory c; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00016.html (9,727 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:08:10 +0100; Two critical bugs were found in forcedeth 0.47: - TSO doesn't work. - pci_map_single() for the rx buffers is called with size==0. This bug is critical, it causes random memory corruptions on systems; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00017.html (11,455 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:52:25 -0800 (PST); Good catch. Btw, should we perhaps disallow (or at least WARN_ON()) pci_map_single() with a length of zero? I think it's always likely a bug.. However, that "skb->end - skb->data" calculation is a bi; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00018.html (9,648 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:56:00 +0100; Of course, on the alloc path, it seems to add an additional "NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD" thing, so maybe the "end-data" thing makes sense. The problem is the pci_unmap_single() call that happens during nv_close; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00019.html (9,733 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:57:48 -0800 (PST); These proper text encodings are easy to _apply_, because the raw email is uncorrupted. However, attachments are still broken for a very fundamental reason: basically no email client will ever quote t; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00020.html (9,684 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:58:26 -0500; "skb->end - skb->data" calculation is a bit strange. It correctly maps the whole skb, but nod wouldn't it make more sense to use the length we actually tell the card to use? In other words, wouldn't; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00021.html (10,045 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:41:35 -0800 (PST); Fair enough. Patch applied. Linus; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00022.html (9,594 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: fix random memory scribbling bug (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:06:02 -0500; Of course, on the alloc path, it seems to add an additional "NV_RX_ALLOC_PAD" thing, so maybe the "end-data" thing makes sense. The problem is the pci_unmap_single() call that happens during nv_clos; /archives/netdev/2005-12/msg00023.html (10,580 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]