Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+kill\s+INDUCE_IO

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+kill\s+INDUCE_IO_ERROR\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:30:43 +1000; looks good, checking it in Niv Sardi; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00501.html (7,255 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:32:59 +0200; Donald NACKed this one..; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00504.html (7,427 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:10:16 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:30:43PM +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: looks good, checking it in Donald NACKed this one.. Yep, but I changed my mind on it a while ago, the blocklayer er; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00506.html (8,137 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: aiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:30:43 +1000; looks good, checking it in Niv Sardi; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01124.html (7,255 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:32:59 +0200; Donald NACKed this one..; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01127.html (7,427 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:10:16 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:30:43PM +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: looks good, checking it in Donald NACKed this one.. Yep, but I changed my mind on it a while ago, the blocklayer er; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01129.html (8,137 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:12 +0200; Can I get a review on this absolutely trivial patch? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00165.html (11,245 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:45:11 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:23:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: All the error injection is already enabled through ifdef DEBUG, so kill the never set second cpp symbol to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00186.html (11,517 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:05:36 +0200; cpp symbols not exposed by Kconfig will never get tested. If you thing it's really useful for release builds (which don't quite agree with) we should just enable it unconditionally. It's just in a fe; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00197.html (8,537 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:12 +0200; Can I get a review on this absolutely trivial patch? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00625.html (11,245 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:45:11 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:23:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: All the error injection is already enabled through ifdef DEBUG, so kill the never set second cpp symbol to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00646.html (11,517 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:05:36 +0200; cpp symbols not exposed by Kconfig will never get tested. If you thing it's really useful for release builds (which don't quite agree with) we should just enable it unconditionally. It's just in a fe; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00657.html (8,537 bytes)
13. routines (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 08:23:23 +0200; All the error injection is already enabled through ifdef DEBUG, so kill the never set second cpp symbol to activate it without the rest of the debugging infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellw; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00365.html (9,462 bytes)
14. : [PATCH] use generic_*xattr routines (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 08:23:23 +0200; . But getting rid of vn_rev; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00849.html (9,462 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:30:43 +1000; looks good, checking it in -- Niv Sardi; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01747.html (7,371 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:32:59 +0200; Donald NACKed this one..; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01750.html (7,531 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:10:16 +1000; Donald NACKed this one.. Yep, but I changed my mind on it a while ago, the blocklayer error injection looks like a more useful framework for testing with release builds. Niv and I chatted about it an; /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01752.html (8,266 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:12 +0200; Can I get a review on this absolutely trivial patch? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01085.html (11,361 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:45:11 +1000; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:23:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: All the error injection is already enabled through ifdef DEBUG, so kill the never set second cpp symbol to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01106.html (12,004 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH] kill INDUCE_IO_ERROR (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:05:36 +0200; cpp symbols not exposed by Kconfig will never get tested. If you thing it's really useful for release builds (which don't quite agree with) we should just enable it unconditionally. It's just in a fe; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01117.html (8,673 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]