Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+lose\s+xfs_hex_dump\s+in\s+favor\s+of\s+print_hex

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+lose\s+xfs_hex_dump\s+in\s+favor\s+of\s+print_hex_dump\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:11:44 -0500; es (21 GB; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00288.html (9,466 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:32:32 -0700; ight be f; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00290.html (7,904 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:31:45 -0500; rototype?; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00291.html (8,693 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:28:56 +0100; s/kdbm_pg; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00301.html (8,941 bytes)
5. [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:11:44 -0500; 836480 Bytes (21 GB; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00689.html (9,466 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:32:32 -0700; s_repair might be f; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00691.html (7,904 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:31:45 -0500; have the prototype?; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00692.html (8,693 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:28:56 +0100; kdb/modules/kdbm_pg; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00702.html (8,941 bytes)
9. [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:11:44 -0500; No need for xfs to have its own hex dumping routine now that the kernel has one. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_error.c == -- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01090.html (9,466 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:32:32 -0700; Is this symbol exported/needed? If not then why not make it a #define or an inline in the header where you have the prototype?; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01092.html (7,952 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:31:45 -0500; Yeah, I suppose that might be better.... I just followed the lead of xfs_cmn_err etc. The only reason I left a wrapper was for cattelan's BSD exploits (er, adventures) ;-) I could imagine it getting; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01093.html (8,777 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] lose xfs_hex_dump in favor of print_hex_dump (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:28:56 +0100; No point in making anything in an absolute slowpath inline or a macro. I think the patch is fine as-is.; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01103.html (9,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]