- 1. stack usage in xfs_page_state_convert() (score: 1)
- Author: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:24:10 +0200
- cularly liked it. But the inlining of functions with -funit-at-a-time was such a problem for the s
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00478.html (8,915 bytes)
- 2. xfs_bmap_btalloc() (score: 1)
- Author: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:24:10 +0200
- date already is completely Linux specific due to the VFS flags passed in, so it might aswell be merged into xfs_fs_remount. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01074.html (8,915 bytes)
- 3. [PATCH] vfs: reduce stack usage in write_cache_pages() (score: 1)
- Author: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:24:10 +0200
- Hi Al, David, vfs function write_cache_pages() appears on the xfs writeout path. It's *the* path which causes 4k stack overflows on i386 with xfs. This function uses ~100 bytes of stack on 32-bit i38
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01670.html (8,915 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu