- 1. [PATCH] xfstests 219: test fiemap (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:43:20 -0500
- Preliminary fiemap testing support based on a test util written by Josef Bacik. For now it's only run with preallocation disabled, because xfs has a tendency to fill in holes with data blocks (EOF pr
- /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00153.html (32,428 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH] xfstests 219: test fiemap (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:23:39 -0400
- Wouldn't we be better off to add an fiemap command to xfs_io so that we can re-use it instead of having a special test program in xfstests?
- /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00172.html (7,905 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH] xfstests 219: test fiemap (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:32:45 -0500
- I suppose it'd be nice to have, though in this case the test program also generates all the random patterns and does the checking ... the fiemap calls are a relatively simple part of it ... Using xfs
- /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00176.html (8,370 bytes)
- 4. Re: [PATCH] xfstests 219: test fiemap (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:19:48 -0400
- fiemap support in xfs_io would still be useful. The big difference with fsx and co is that the I/O path is quite performance critical even for testcases, while for preallocation it's not. But if it m
- /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00187.html (8,327 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH] xfstests 219: test fiemap (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:48:05 -0500
- Ok, we can add that. Another patch. :) It's easier in the sense that it's done. It'd be nice to get some fiemap coverage & this is a quick route that seems to work. Thanks, -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00271.html (9,044 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu