Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+0\/7\]\s+inode\s+allocation\s+cleanups\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+0\/7\]\s+inode\s+allocation\s+cleanups\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:16:07 -0400; This series contains various cleanups and refactorings to xfs_ialloc.c, some of them are my own and some are from Dave Chinner. The last patch is also from Dave and speeds up the search for free inod; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00081.html (7,723 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:30:30 -0400; ping? any reviewers for this? --end quoted text--; /archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00261.html (7,337 bytes)
3. RE: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:57:16 -0500; I no longer have these in my mailbox, but I've reviewed them all, and they all look good. Very nice result of getting rid of duplication and making functions a more manageable size. One comment on p; /archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00270.html (8,907 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:56:45 -0400; Good catch, the two in xfs_dialloc should indeed be WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTOs. For the one in xfs_ialloc_next_rec. Below is the updated version of the patch, still needs to run through XFSQA again: Clarif; /archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00286.html (24,723 bytes)
5. RE: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:12:50 -0500; . . . I did not review this one as carefully, but I see that you changed those two spots to WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO() calls and I assume that's all that's really changed. Looks good. -Alex; /archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00287.html (8,603 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:58:24 -0400; That is one change, the other is making sure we goto to the error1 label for all failures from xfs_ialloc_next_rec - two of them were missing it.; /archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00297.html (8,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]