Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+0\/7\]\s+inode\s+allocation\s+cleanups\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:16:07 -0400
This series contains various cleanups and refactorings to xfs_ialloc.c, some of them are my own and some are from Dave Chinner. The last patch is also from Dave and speeds up the search for free inod
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00081.html (7,723 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:30:30 -0400
ping? any reviewers for this? --end quoted text--
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00261.html (7,337 bytes)

3. RE: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:57:16 -0500
I no longer have these in my mailbox, but I've reviewed them all, and they all look good. Very nice result of getting rid of duplication and making functions a more manageable size. One comment on p
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00270.html (8,907 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:56:45 -0400
Good catch, the two in xfs_dialloc should indeed be WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTOs. For the one in xfs_ialloc_next_rec. Below is the updated version of the patch, still needs to run through XFSQA again: Clarif
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00286.html (24,723 bytes)

5. RE: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:12:50 -0500
. . . I did not review this one as carefully, but I see that you changed those two spots to WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO() calls and I assume that's all that's really changed. Looks good. -Alex
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00287.html (8,603 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH 0/7] inode allocation cleanups (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:58:24 -0400
That is one change, the other is making sure we goto to the error1 label for all failures from xfs_ialloc_next_rec - two of them were missing it.
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00297.html (8,624 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu