Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+04\/11\]\s+xfs\:\s+factor\s+out\s+xfs_da_grow_inode

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+04\/11\]\s+xfs\:\s+factor\s+out\s+xfs_da_grow_inode_int\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:49:20 -0400; xfs_da_grow_inode and xfs_dir2_grow_inode are mostly duplicate code. Factor the meat of those two functions into a new common helper. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/x; /archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00259.html (21,804 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:37:43 +1000; Hmmmm. I'm in the process of splitting xfs_dir2_grow_inode() into data space vs free space variants so I can play speculative preallocation tricks in the directory data space to reduce dataspace frag; /archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00274.html (9,681 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:24:06 -0400; Are you two variants still sharing the core code? If yes rebasing sounds like the better idea. If the two dir2 variants are different enough from the da variant I'm fine with postponing this one for; /archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00277.html (10,241 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:32:58 -0500; Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00291.html (9,682 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: factor out xfs_da_grow_inode_int (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:55:35 +1000; Sort of - there's an extra allocation failure case added (multiple directory block size allocation failure), but otherwise is the same. I'll rebase anyway - the code won't be ready for 3.1 because I; /archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00301.html (11,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]