Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/4\]\s+fs\:\s+add\s+SEEK_HOLE\s+and\s+SEEK_DATA\s+flags\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:33:15 -0400
This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. Turns out using fiemap in things like cp cause more problems than it solves, so lets try and give userspace an interface that doe
/archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00454.html (12,100 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:58:47 +0200
Sorry maybe I'm a bit late? :) Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin) { + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
/archives/xfs/2011-07/msg00750.html (8,767 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:41:31 +0200
Hi, Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. Turns out using fiemap in things like cp cause more problems than it solves, so
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00324.html (10,055 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:03:07 +0200
Il 20/08/2011 11:41, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: Hi, Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. Turns out using fiemap in thing
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00325.html (9,611 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:36:43 -0700
Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. Turns out using fiemap in things like cp cause more problems than it solves, so lets
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00326.html (10,542 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:32:49 +0200
Il 20/08/2011 17:36, Sunil Mushran ha scritto: On 08/20/2011 03:03 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 20/08/2011 11:41, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: Hi, Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: This ju
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00327.html (11,926 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:18:37 -0400
Marco, You may want to enable the xfstests test(s) for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA for pramfs.  That should give you some confidence your implementing the api like other filesystems are. Greg
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00328.html (10,695 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:08:15 -0700
On 08/20/2011 09:32 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 20/08/2011 17:36, Sunil Mushran ha scritto: On 08/20/2011 03:03 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: Il 20/08/2011 11:41, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: Hi, Il 28
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00340.html (12,536 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:56:54 +0200
2011/8/22 Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>: Mmmm.....It seems that Josef has to be clear in this point. However I looked for the seek hole test in xfs test suite, but I didn't find anything.
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00356.html (13,941 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:57:51 -0700
On 08/22/2011 03:56 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: 2011/8/22 Sunil Mushran<sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>: On 08/20/2011 09:32 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: Thank. Yes the word "next" is not very clear. I re-rea
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00361.html (11,340 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:56:31 +0200
Il 22/08/2011 17:57, Sunil Mushran ha scritto: Any proposal that differentiates between holes is wrong. It should not matter where the hole is. Think of it from the usage-pov. doff = 0; while ((doff
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00362.html (12,594 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:22:24 -0700
The following test was used to test the early implementations. http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/seek_data/ Thank you very much!! I found another point. Your test fails with my implementation because h
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00363.html (11,501 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:44:20 +0200
The following test was used to test the early implementations. http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/seek_data/ Thank you very much!! I found another point. Your test fails with my implementation because h
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00384.html (12,461 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:35:08 +1000
Which is exactly why I'm trying to get the definitions clarified first, then the behaviour codified in a single test suite we can call the 'authoritive test'. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxx
/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00545.html (12,802 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu