Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\.11\s+1\/8\]\s+tg3\:\s+add\s+5705

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\.11\s+1\/8\]\s+tg3\:\s+add\s+5705_plus\s+flag\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. entity Protocol (score: 1): Author: bert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:14:42 -0800; Add a 5705_plus flag to indicate the device is 5705, 5750, or future chips that all share the same basic architecture. This makes it easier to add support for future devices. Signed-off-by: Michael C; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01162.html (7,893 bytes)
2. 6.11] e1000: avoid sleeping in watchdog timer context (score: 1): Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:52:27 -0500; Michael Chan wrote: Add a 5705_plus flag to indicate the device is 5705, 5750, or future chips that all share the same basic architecture. This makes it easier to add support for future devices. Sign; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01224.html (9,904 bytes)
3. a build fixes (score: 1): Author: Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:03:47 -0800; Patch applied, thanks Michael.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01329.html (8,001 bytes)
4. e: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:51:52 -0800; Except this isn't really a feature flag, per se. That would be something like TG3_HAS_FOO, in other words "what particular feature this if statement actually cares about". What is currently 5705_PLUS; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01365.html (9,410 bytes)
5. [PATCH 2.6.11 1/8] tg3: add 5705_plus flag (score: 1): Author: "Michael Chan" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:14:42 -0800; Add a 5705_plus flag to indicate the device is 5705, 5750, or future chips that all share the same basic architecture. This makes it easier to add support for future devices. Signed-off-by: Michael C; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03085.html (7,893 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 2.6.11 1/8] tg3: add 5705_plus flag (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:52:27 -0500; Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx ACK, and two comments: 1) In general, I encourage changes like this, for both tg3 and other net drivers. It is -much- better to define a feature flag,; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03147.html (9,891 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 2.6.11 1/8] tg3: add 5705_plus flag (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:03:47 -0800; Patch applied, thanks Michael.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03252.html (8,097 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 2.6.11 1/8] tg3: add 5705_plus flag (score: 1): Author: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:51:52 -0800; Except this isn't really a feature flag, per se. That would be something like TG3_HAS_FOO, in other words "what particular feature this if statement actually cares about". What is currently 5705_PLUS; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03288.html (9,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]