Umm, instead of pointing out the misnaming of xlog_in_core_2_t, why not properly name it, or does that proliferate too much? Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> +0200 for (i = 0; i < len; i
Umm, instead of pointing out the misnaming of xlog_in_core_2_t, why not properly name it, or does that proliferate too much? Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> +0200 for (i = 0; i < len; i
Move all fields from xlog_iclog_fields_t into xlog_in_core_t instead of having them in a substructure and the using #defines to make it look like they were directly in xlog_in_core_t. Also document t