Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+4\/7\]\s+xfs\:\s+cleanup\s+xlog_bread\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 4/7] xfs: cleanup xlog_bread (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:52:11 -0500
Most callers of xlog_bread need to call xlog_align to get the actual offset. Consolidate that call into the main xlog_bread and provide a _xlog_bread for those few that don't want the actual offset.
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00375.html (28,140 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: cleanup xlog_bread (score: 1)
Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:48:41 -0500
Only one leading underscore? IOW, why not not __xlog_bread? (That's definitely more Linux-like.) Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- The box said "Windows XP or better required". So I installed Linux.
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00394.html (8,773 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: cleanup xlog_bread (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0500
In that deep down xfs code a single underscore is the more common idiom. Of course a descriptive name might be even better :)
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00433.html (9,309 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: cleanup xlog_bread (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:53:56 +1100
..... xlog_bread_noalign(). Otherwise looks good. Consider it: Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2009-03/msg00107.html (8,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu