Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+5\/7\]\s+kill\s+xfs_dinode_core_t\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:37:34 -0500
Still can't reproduce it on either x86 or ppc64. I'll give x86_64 a go in the next days.
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00077.html (7,434 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:52:25 -0500
Ok, found the problem, and it actually did hit ppc64 too except that a later patch in the series fixed it. The problem is that the 96byte xfs_dinode is not naturall aligned on 64bit plafroms, so ther
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00116.html (44,075 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:37:34 -0500
Still can't reproduce it on either x86 or ppc64. I'll give x86_64 a go in the next days.
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00395.html (7,434 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:52:25 -0500
Ok, found the problem, and it actually did hit ppc64 too except that a later patch in the series fixed it. The problem is that the 96byte xfs_dinode is not naturall aligned on 64bit plafroms, so ther
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00434.html (44,075 bytes)

5. ectories (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:39:12 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00619.html (44,053 bytes)

6. ith xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:56:29 +1100
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00666.html (8,818 bytes)

7. XFSQA test 182 failures.... (score: 1)
Author: avid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:02:05 +1100
There's a problem with this patch somewhere. I haven't had it in my test stack for the last couple of days, and when I re-added it a couple of hours back after updating the base kernel and master bra
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00752.html (11,260 bytes)

8. imatiqu (score: 1)
Author: ellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:35:28 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00799.html (44,033 bytes)

9. 2] convert xfs_getbmap to take formatter functions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:35:28 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01408.html (44,033 bytes)

10. информационные базы данных (score: 1)
Author: toph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:39:12 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01478.html (43,890 bytes)

11. em recovery (score: 1)
Author: ve Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:56:29 +1100
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01524.html (8,653 bytes)

12. teback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:02:05 +1100
There's a problem with this patch somewhere. I haven't had it in my test stack for the last couple of days, and when I re-added it a couple of hours back after updating the base kernel and master bra
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01610.html (11,081 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:37:34 -0500
Still can't reproduce it on either x86 or ppc64. I'll give x86_64 a go in the next days.
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00713.html (7,607 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:52:25 -0500
Ok, found the problem, and it actually did hit ppc64 too except that a later patch in the series fixed it. The problem is that the 96byte xfs_dinode is not naturall aligned on 64bit plafroms, so ther
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00752.html (44,248 bytes)

15. [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:35:28 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02226.html (44,033 bytes)

16. [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:39:12 -0400
Now that we have a separate xfs_icdinode_t for the in-core inode which gets logged there is no need anymore for the xfs_dinode vs xfs_dinode_core split - the fact that part of the structure gets logg
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02296.html (43,890 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:56:29 +1100
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02342.html (8,711 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH 5/7] kill xfs_dinode_core_t (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:02:05 +1100
There's a problem with this patch somewhere. I haven't had it in my test stack for the last couple of days, and when I re-added it a couple of hours back after updating the base kernel and master bra
/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02428.html (11,139 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu