Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[REVIEW\]\s+Don\'t\s+make\s+lazy\s+counters\s+default\s+for\s+mkfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[REVIEW\]\s+Don\'t\s+make\s+lazy\s+counters\s+default\s+for\s+mkfs\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:11:51 -0600; I thought about that; xfs *could* stick someting in /proc/fs/xfs with supported features or somesuch. But, the kernel you mkfs under isn't necessarily the one you're going to need to fall back to tom; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01241.html (9,669 bytes)
62. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:19:31 -0600; Hmm, that still seems pretty soon to me. I'd have thought you'd at least want to wait until most of the distributions (esp. SUSE for you guys) have released versions that have kernels sufficiently r; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01242.html (10,849 bytes)
63. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:47:06 +1100; Hmm, that still seems pretty soon to me. I'd have thought you'd at least want to wait until most of the distributions (esp. SUSE for you guys) have released versions that have kernels sufficiently r; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01243.html (11,771 bytes)
64. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:56:04 -0600; maybe just 2 values, with the actual supported features (& features2) values anded together? Easy enough to parse in the code. i.e. 0xffffffff 0x00000001 ? -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01244.html (10,623 bytes)
65. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:11 -0500; I'd say strings like: lazy-count attr2 Something that'd match the mkfs option strings closely. This would make iterating over the features supported easy in a shell script... cat /proc/fs/xfs/feature; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01245.html (11,505 bytes)
66. Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:11:03 -0600; hm, but of course mkfs should never be checking for anything in the first features slot; yesterday's kernels support all those flags but don't export anything. wow, this is starting to feel as comple; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01246.html (10,036 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 66
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]