Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+Extend\s+netlink\s+error\s+codes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+Extend\s+netlink\s+error\s+codes\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:51:58 +0200; v44? Is; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00322.html (8,558 bytes)
2. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: rt Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:07:36 -0700; r tree.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00325.html (8,816 bytes)
3. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Sep 2004 21:38:59 -0400; think?; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00332.html (10,558 bytes)
4. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: aki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:49:14 +0200; ? -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00343.html (10,106 bytes)
5. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:58:39 +0200; er. The; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00344.html (9,501 bytes)
6. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: s Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:24:33 +0200; scs) Ot; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00345.html (10,212 bytes)
7. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:50:56 +0200; it via; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00346.html (10,321 bytes)
8. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:57:52 +0200; packet; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00347.html (10,275 bytes)
9. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:48:52 -0700; r.error; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00348.html (12,065 bytes)
10. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: homas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Sep 2004 17:10:35 -0400; us movi; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00352.html (12,657 bytes)
11. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: neakums@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:37:44 -0700; nk you.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00385.html (9,270 bytes)
12. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:26:13 +0200; oblem a; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00406.html (9,858 bytes)
13. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: dan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:33:08 -0700; it by h; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00431.html (9,416 bytes)
14. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:36:57 +0200; erbert.; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00435.html (12,419 bytes)
15. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:28:11 -0700; do tree; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00452.html (10,065 bytes)
16. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 13 Sep 2004 22:00:23 -0400; th0->et; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00461.html (11,228 bytes)
17. [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:51:58 +0200; The current situation with error codes sent back to a netlink application is unsatisfactory. Most often, the application receives EINVAL but has no idea what was wrong. Here is my plan: Introduce som; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01778.html (8,558 bytes)
18. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:07:36 -0700; It sounds like it could work. Jamal, any objections to his idea?; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01781.html (8,876 bytes)
19. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Sep 2004 21:38:59 -0400; I think its a good idea. so, questions: classical ABI issues a) old kernel vs new app b) new kernel vs old app i.e: The use of existing error codes is still valuable. Existing apps will do: errno = m; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01788.html (10,662 bytes)
20. Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:49:14 +0200; * jamal <1094866738.1042.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-09-10 21:38 Outdated error string table should result in a unknown error like in strerror. 2^16 errno codes should be sufficient forever. The; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01799.html (10,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]