Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[linux\-lvm\]\s+How\s+well\s+tested\s+is\s+the\s+snapshot\s+feature\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[linux\-lvm\]\s+How\s+well\s+tested\s+is\s+the\s+snapshot\s+feature\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: eo@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:35:44 -0700; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00192.html (11,343 bytes)
2. Re: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: h@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:47:32 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00197.html (9,214 bytes)
3. RE: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:31:30 -0700; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00200.html (10,671 bytes)
4. Re: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: d@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 09:59:31 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00216.html (11,759 bytes)
5. Re: [linux-lvm] How well tested is the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:10:22 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00217.html (8,548 bytes)
6. .4.17). (score: 1): Author: ntonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:35:44 -0700; ertain applications write to file; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00696.html (11,343 bytes)
7. VED cp -p problem (score: 1): Author: ich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:47:32 +0100; ll, merely the way I had it configured. I felt I should not have had an ACL flag if I wasnt using it.. The cp binary I sent you was compiled using the ACL flag. I hav; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00701.html (9,214 bytes)
8. the snapshot feature? (score: 1): Author: npollitt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:31:30 -0700; 0010000004400000000000000 a82086856f69f7c20e000000010; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00704.html (10,671 bytes)
9. sive writeout of mmap pages (score: 1): Author: ve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 09:59:31 +0100; for and write out pages which it should not have. Showed up as a failure in fsx when running under heavy memory load. The following file(s) were checked into: bonni; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00720.html (11,759 bytes)
10. ag (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:10:22 +0100; ally need this, another xfs change to the core kernel bites the dust. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x; /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00721.html (8,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]