Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ogl\-sample\]\s+Missing\s+GLX\s+tokens\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ogl\-sample\]\s+Missing\s+GLX\s+tokens\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: Steve Baker <steve@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:46:19 -0500 (CDT); Is the latest GLX extensions header still this one? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/ABI/glxext.h If so, then it is missing these two symbols: If not, could you please point me at the latest on; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00002.html (7,698 bytes)
2. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Leath Muller" <Leath.Muller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:55:39 +1000; I haven't used the ARB calls -- where they finalised? (Obviously were... :) The WGL ext and the normal glext.h have the EXT's defined -- will they do? Leathal.; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00003.html (8,073 bytes)
3. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Baker" <sjbaker@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:19:01 -0500 (CDT); Well, they are in the extensions registry - and they work on my GeForce-3 card under Linux. If they aren't "finalised" they certainly *ought* to be! Eh? In the file here: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00004.html (9,486 bytes)
4. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Leath Muller" <Leath.Muller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:35:19 +1000; I think it may be a small oversight with the updater that automagically updates the *ext.h files... it seems that the glext.h has different defines to the wglext.h and the glxext.h has different aga; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00007.html (9,725 bytes)
5. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Baker" <sjbaker@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:00:23 -0500 (CDT); Yes - I do: (which is what the documentation in the extension registry says the values are)...and it seems to work OK (at least with the nVidia GF-3 and their new 1.0-1251 drivers). -- Steve Baker (; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00008.html (8,300 bytes)
6. [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: Steve Baker <steve@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:46:19 -0500 (CDT); Is the latest GLX extensions header still this one? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/ABI/glxext.h If so, then it is missing these two symbols: If not, could you please point me at the latest on; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00019.html (7,743 bytes)
7. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Leath Muller" <Leath.Muller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:55:39 +1000; I haven't used the ARB calls -- where they finalised? (Obviously were... :) The WGL ext and the normal glext.h have the EXT's defined -- will they do? Leathal.; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00020.html (8,137 bytes)
8. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Baker" <sjbaker@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:19:01 -0500 (CDT); Well, they are in the extensions registry - and they work on my GeForce-3 card under Linux. If they aren't "finalised" they certainly *ought* to be! Eh? In the file here: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00021.html (9,571 bytes)
9. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Leath Muller" <Leath.Muller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:35:19 +1000; I think it may be a small oversight with the updater that automagically updates the *ext.h files... it seems that the glext.h has different defines to the wglext.h and the glxext.h has different aga; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00024.html (9,774 bytes)
10. Re: [ogl-sample] Missing GLX tokens. (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Baker" <sjbaker@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:00:23 -0500 (CDT); Yes - I do: (which is what the documentation in the extension registry says the values are)...and it seems to work OK (at least with the nVidia GF-3 and their new 1.0-1251 drivers). -- Steve Baker (; /archives/ogl-sample/2001-06/msg00025.html (8,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]