Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+fix\s+parallel\s+build\s+failures\s+in\s+xfsprogs\-3\.0\.0\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:10:24 -0500
i noticed that xfsprogs-3.0.0 sometimes fails to build in parallel with an error about fsr not being able to find libhandle. looking at the top level Makefile shows the obvious missing depend (fsr: l
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00419.html (8,450 bytes)

2. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:20:40 -0600
Seems fine. Looks like that dep got missed when fsr moved. the include dependency might be a big hammer, but *shrug* (it takes care of the "estimate" dependency on include too) I'll check this in, th
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00420.html (8,021 bytes)

3. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:22:40 -0600
Oh, can you resend with a formal Signed-off-by: line? Being a little nitpicky here but we follow the same process as kernel patches. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00421.html (7,475 bytes)

4. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:21:43 -0500
where is the git tree now ? i tried git://oss.sgi.com/xfs-cmds but that seems to be dead now. -mike Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00422.html (8,780 bytes)

5. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:15:23 -0500
http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git;a=tree for the bleeding edge development tree.
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00425.html (9,624 bytes)

6. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:53:56 -0500
ok, so i'll base all my patches on the git trees that are available on kernel.org. the xfs.org wiki talks about git trees on sgi.com, but some of them are old and/or moved (like the xfs-cmds one) ...
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00434.html (10,425 bytes)

7. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:14:13 -0600
the xfs.org wiki talks about git trees on sgi.com, Yes, they're still there. but some of them are old and/or moved (like the xfs-cmds one) ... xfs-cmds was split into separate repos for xfsprogs, xf
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00438.html (9,887 bytes)

8. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:37:49 -0500
but acl/attr have not. distros care about those packages as well. yes, i was reading the page. i was also pointing out the broken link to the xfs-cmds repo (which is after everything you quoted) and
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00439.html (10,180 bytes)

9. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:46:24 -0500
Andreas who has done most of the maintaince already is taking these over formally, so they won't be released with the xfs tools anymore. I've put him on Cc so he can say when he expects to clear the
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00444.html (11,075 bytes)

10. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:22:48 +0100
I think I have caught up with the backlog by now in my current trees: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/agruen/attr.git http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/agruen/acl.git The repos are
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00450.html (10,414 bytes)

11. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:45:25 -0500
is this mailing list still going to be used for acl/attr ? here are the patches i have for acl.git: http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/acl/files/acl-2.2.45-libtool.patch http://sources.gentoo.org/sys
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00454.html (11,561 bytes)

12. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:26:14 +0100
I would like to keep the discussion here until the packages have found a final new location, if SGI won't mind. Added. Added. This functionality already exists (in both the acl and attr packages). Ad
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00461.html (10,676 bytes)

13. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:03:29 -0500
was this in the last release (2.4.43) ? either way, can you highlight the code you're referring to so there's no confusion on my part ;) -mike
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00462.html (9,699 bytes)

14. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:23:08 +0100
Hmm ... so there code that this patch adds to include/gettext.h already exists in include/config.h.in, but ENABLE_GETTEXT isn't being defined anywhere. So this part of your patch still seems to be ne
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00464.html (11,990 bytes)

15. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:17:28 -0500
yes. i dont know why the xfs progs have been packaging these autogenerated files by themselves. - remove aclocal.m4 from git - run `aclocal -I m4` - run `libtoolize -c -f` - run `autoconf` - copy the
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00466.html (13,204 bytes)

16. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:17:02 +0100
You mean this should become the normal build process? I was actually more thinking along the lines of reducing build dependencies by adding a few more generated files like ./configure ... Thanks, And
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00470.html (10,190 bytes)

17. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:08:54 -0500
no, this is the process for going from live git to a dist tarball. people who download tarballs should never need autotools installed. people who build from live scms should. -mike
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00471.html (9,983 bytes)

18. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:03:00 -0500
Do you plan to take over nfs4acl, too?
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00473.html (10,350 bytes)

19. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:22:59 +1100
Some packages provide a shell script called autogen.sh which automates all those tedious autotools steps. The Gnome autogen.sh is fairly general and does things like check for autotools versions and
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00474.html (11,717 bytes)

20. Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:51 +0100
Of course, the classic way is to keep all the generated files out of the repository. On the other hand, if we added all the generated files to the repository, all that would be needed would be creati
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00476.html (11,965 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu