Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.3\.1\s+patches\s+against\s+those\s+old\s+Redhat\s+7\.3\s+kernels\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1\.3\.1\s+patches\s+against\s+those\s+old\s+Redhat\s+7\.3\s+kernels\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:30:28 +0800; Hi list, My company is still running old Redhat 7.3 based kernels on some products, and unfortunately, I'm supposed to port xfs 1.3.1 back to them. I've digged through the list archive, finding only; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00169.html (8,305 bytes)
2. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:36:01 +0100; Here's one with 1.3.0 by Axel Thimm: http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/dist/rh73/kernel/ If that's not good enough you can always use that as a basis for applying the 1.3.1 patch to it instead. // S; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00170.html (8,965 bytes)
3. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:34:39 -0500 (EST); As I recall, the only real difference between 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 were some documentation things. Functionally, they should be exactly the same. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00175.html (10,023 bytes)
4. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:37:38 +0100; Well, wasn't in the case that they also removed something that might be find to be infringing on SCO? I think that was one of the reasons behind 1.3.1. And since it's for a company and not an indivi; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00176.html (10,324 bytes)
5. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:14:15 +0100; AFAIK just before redhat stopped supporting redhat-8 and redhat-7 they syncronized the kernels for these versions, so you should be able to use this one: ftp://ftp.ii.uib.no/pub/janfrode/XFS/rh8/SRPM; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00177.html (8,810 bytes)
6. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:14:42 -0600; Do you happen to have a kernel-source-2.4.20-30.8.XFS1.3.1.i386.rpm laying around somewhere? I don't see it in the i386 dir. (Only releases -24 and -28). Thanks, Dan -- Dan Yocum Sloan Digital Sky S; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00180.html (9,794 bytes)
7. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:18:21 +0100; OK, uploaded it to the i386 now.. -jf; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00181.html (8,479 bytes)
8. 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:30:28 +0800; Hi list, My company is still running old Redhat 7.3 based kernels on some products, and unfortunately, I'm supposed to port xfs 1.3.1 back to them. I've digged through the list archive, finding only; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00559.html (8,305 bytes)
9. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:36:01 +0100; Here's one with 1.3.0 by Axel Thimm: http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/dist/rh73/kernel/ If that's not good enough you can always use that as a basis for applying the 1.3.1 patch to it instead. // S; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00560.html (8,965 bytes)
10. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:34:39 -0500 (EST); As I recall, the only real difference between 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 were some documentation things. Functionally, they should be exactly the same. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00565.html (10,023 bytes)
11. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:37:38 +0100; Well, wasn't in the case that they also removed something that might be find to be infringing on SCO? I think that was one of the reasons behind 1.3.1. And since it's for a company and not an indivi; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00566.html (10,324 bytes)
12. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:14:15 +0100; AFAIK just before redhat stopped supporting redhat-8 and redhat-7 they syncronized the kernels for these versions, so you should be able to use this one: ftp://ftp.ii.uib.no/pub/janfrode/XFS/rh8/SRPM; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00567.html (8,810 bytes)
13. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:14:42 -0600; Do you happen to have a kernel-source-2.4.20-30.8.XFS1.3.1.i386.rpm laying around somewhere? I don't see it in the i386 dir. (Only releases -24 and -28). Thanks, Dan -- Dan Yocum Sloan Digital Sky S; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00570.html (9,794 bytes)
14. Re: 1.3.1 patches against those old Redhat 7.3 kernels? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:18:21 +0100; OK, uploaded it to the i386 now.. -jf; /archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00571.html (8,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]