Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.13\s+Mem\s+Related\s+Hangs\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Dec 2001 09:14:02 -0600
Going through my old email - I think I just fixed this - there was a bug in the delayed allocation handling in XFS which caused a memory leak due to a buffer_head reference count leak. The latest cvs
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00390.html (10,356 bytes)

2. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Jason Allen <jallen@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:30:46 -0600
We upgraded our 8CPU/8GB Dell to 2.4.16 w/XFS last week and it works *much* better than previous 2.4 w/XFS kernels. No, hangs, crashes or VM weirdness, even under heavy loads. Thanks, Jason Allen Fer
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00391.html (11,153 bytes)

3. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Dec 2001 09:32:15 -0600
You might want to sync up with the latest kernel when you get a chance, a couple of nasty bugs in the I/O path got squashed this week. I will ask Eric to update the 2.4.16 patches so that cvs is not
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00392.html (12,228 bytes)

4. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Mihai RUSU <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:01:36 +0200 (EET)
Hi Steve are this bugs present in the 1.0.2 Release too ? im using 2.4.9-13SGI_XFS_1.0.2 and im wondering if i need to upgrade it thank you -- Mihai RUSU "... and what if this is as good as it gets ?
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00405.html (7,952 bytes)

5. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Dec 2001 15:59:38 -0600
The memory leak is not there, there is a deadlock triggered by an ext3 test program, but you need to mmap a chunk of a file, and then do a write into the file using that mmapped chunk as the write bu
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00406.html (8,743 bytes)

6. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:54:32 -0500
Steve Lord wrote: On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 09:54, Jim Eshleman wrote: FWIW me too, on an 8-way 8.5GB (64GB HIGHMEM enabled) IBM Netfinity x370 (8500R) which functions as a production mail server. I curr
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00473.html (11,057 bytes)

7. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:04:44 -0500
Jim Eshleman wrote: Steve Lord wrote: On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 09:54, Jim Eshleman wrote: FWIW me too, on an 8-way 8.5GB (64GB HIGHMEM enabled) IBM Netfinity x370 (8500R) which functions as a production
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00538.html (11,656 bytes)

8. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 13 Dec 2001 09:14:02 -0600
tory processing when the number of directory entries is g
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01069.html (10,356 bytes)

9. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:30:46 -0600
due to a buffer_head reference count leak. The latest cvs
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01070.html (11,153 bytes)

10. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 13 Dec 2001 09:32:15 -0600
eirdness, even under heavy loads. Thanks, Jason Allen Fer
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01071.html (12,228 bytes)

11. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:01:36 +0200 (EET)
nnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs Modid: 2.5.x-xfs:
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01084.html (7,952 bytes)

12. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 13 Dec 2001 15:59:38 -0600
Mihai RUSU "... and what if this is as good as it gets ?
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01085.html (8,743 bytes)

13. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:54:32 -0500
lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01152.html (11,057 bytes)

14. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:04:44 -0500
=2 that under some tests the machine would hang or die. T
/archives/xfs/2001-12/msg01217.html (11,656 bytes)

15. Re: 2.4.13 Mem Related Hangs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:14:49 -0500
FWIW me too, on an 8-way 8.5GB (64GB HIGHMEM enabled) IBM Netfinity x370 (8500R) which functions as a production mail server. I currently run 2.4.9 with XFS and it stays up for about a week under he
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00092.html (7,738 bytes)

16. ilable? (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:54:59 -0500
n
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00347.html (9,199 bytes)

17. 5 drive (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:14:49 -0500
h
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00825.html (7,738 bytes)

18. izes available? (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:54:59 -0500
lin
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg01080.html (9,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu