Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.0\-test8\s+XFS\s+bug\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:09:51 +1000
5.5 Tb -- are you using the LBD option, or a 64 bit platform? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What does that mean? (cca?) thanks. You're allocating real disk space for delayed allocate file data down this p
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00191.html (9,248 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
Using LBD. It means 'approximately'. To be more precise, there were 24 nodes copying data to and from the partition via NFS. I can simply reproduce it - the only thing needed is to nfsmount this part
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00193.html (9,871 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:43:42 +0200
Do the crashes still occur after a re-mkfs? -- Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00197.html (8,200 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:28:41 +1000
OK, I missed that information in your last mail then, I thought you had done successful NFS tests and then failed on a local cp. Looks like we need to focus on more XFS/NFS testing in 2.6; will do. U
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00198.html (9,372 bytes)

5. 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:59 +0200 (CEST)
I've installed 2.6.0-test8 on machine attached to HW raid, made 5.5TB partition (using LVM) and made XFS filesystem on this partition. This partittion was exported to cca 25 nodes. I started some st
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00216.html (11,142 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:09:51 +1000
5.5 Tb -- are you using the LBD option, or a 64 bit platform? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What does that mean? (cca?) thanks. You're allocating real disk space for delayed allocate file data down this p
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00475.html (9,248 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
Using LBD. It means 'approximately'. To be more precise, there were 24 nodes copying data to and from the partition via NFS. I can simply reproduce it - the only thing needed is to nfsmount this part
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00477.html (9,871 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:43:42 +0200
Do the crashes still occur after a re-mkfs? -- Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00481.html (8,200 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:28:41 +1000
OK, I missed that information in your last mail then, I thought you had done successful NFS tests and then failed on a local cp. Looks like we need to focus on more XFS/NFS testing in 2.6; will do. U
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00482.html (9,372 bytes)

10. 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:59 +0200 (CEST)
I've installed 2.6.0-test8 on machine attached to HW raid, made 5.5TB partition (using LVM) and made XFS filesystem on this partition. This partittion was exported to cca 25 nodes. I started some st
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00500.html (11,142 bytes)

11. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:09:51 +1000
5.5 Tb -- are you using the LBD option, or a 64 bit platform? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What does that mean? (cca?) thanks. You're allocating real disk space for delayed allocate file data down this p
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00759.html (9,328 bytes)

12. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: Jirka Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
Using LBD. It means 'approximately'. To be more precise, there were 24 nodes copying data to and from the partition via NFS. I can simply reproduce it - the only thing needed is to nfsmount this part
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00761.html (10,023 bytes)

13. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:43:42 +0200
Do the crashes still occur after a re-mkfs? -- Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00765.html (8,378 bytes)

14. Re: 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:28:41 +1000
OK, I missed that information in your last mail then, I thought you had done successful NFS tests and then failed on a local cp. Looks like we need to focus on more XFS/NFS testing in 2.6; will do. U
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00766.html (9,591 bytes)

15. 2.6.0-test8 XFS bug (score: 1)
Author: Jirka Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:59 +0200 (CEST)
Hi, I've installed 2.6.0-test8 on machine attached to HW raid, made 5.5TB partition (using LVM) and made XFS filesystem on this partition. This partittion was exported to cca 25 nodes. I started some
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00784.html (11,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu